Sponsored

Comp Cams for the S550

Poppacapp

Well-Known Member
Joined
Apr 29, 2015
Threads
11
Messages
1,325
Reaction score
365
Location
NC
Vehicle(s)
2015 Mustang GT

Todd15Fastback

Well-Known Member
Joined
Dec 10, 2013
Threads
80
Messages
10,523
Reaction score
3,883
Location
Atlanta, GA
First Name
Todd
Vehicle(s)
2015 Mustang GT PP Fastback
... lol.... a loss of 60 foot pounds of torque... I need to make you my new drug dealer... link to the 2015 comp cam dyno graphs or it never happened.. 60 lol youre f'ing crazy..
:cheers::D
 

Tommy V

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jul 24, 2014
Threads
72
Messages
3,651
Reaction score
604
Location
Brookly park Md
First Name
Tommy
Vehicle(s)
2015 race red gt pp manual, recaros, 401al DOA "too much boost on 93", 2017 GT Auto
Yea i could see low end tq suffering a little for high end hp,but no way that much.No one would buy those cams with those numbers.Their are trade offs but not that drastic!!!!!!!.
 

1320'

Well-Known Member
Joined
Aug 26, 2014
Threads
19
Messages
3,758
Reaction score
1,616
Location
Medford,Oregon
Vehicle(s)
2011 Avenger...sadly
Where the cams lose power is a lot of shops install phaser limiters and lockouts because they don't know how to tune timing and valve events with a big cam.
Shaun at AED tunes for Comp Stage 3's on the S197 coyotes that has all the power gains and none of the torque loss. If you're losing TQ it's because your tuner isn't good enough.
 

Grimace427

Well-Known Member
Joined
Dec 6, 2013
Threads
14
Messages
6,467
Reaction score
1,702
Location
NoVA
Vehicle(s)
2011 Mustang 5.0
Where the cams lose power is a lot of shops install phaser limiters and lockouts because they don't know how to tune timing and valve events with a big cam.
Shaun at AED tunes for Comp Stage 3's on the S197 coyotes that has all the power gains and none of the torque loss. If you're losing TQ it's because your tuner isn't good enough.

I agree with this to an extent. Some cams require phaser limiters to avoid piston-to-valve contact. However there are plenty of cam options for the Coyote that do not require limiters and don't have any major drawbacks in torque production. For the '11-14 Coyotes you could install 'mini-CJ' exhaust cams which do nothing but increase duration from 260 to 290(stock 11mm lift) and they offer significant gains with no torque loss.
 

Sponsored

RubyRedBoost

Traded EB old name New GT
Joined
Dec 10, 2014
Threads
10
Messages
619
Reaction score
181
Location
Fort Worth
First Name
Josh
Vehicle(s)
2015 Guard GT with PP
We truly wont know till someone forks out the money. Comp states there is 50-60 hp in just these new CR series cams. Lingo such as upper rev range and peak output make me feel these are like the NSR style. I've always been a fan vvt/vvel or whatever. Partial lock out and phaser limitations seems like a waste.
 
OP
OP
arieso94z28

arieso94z28

Well-Known Member
Joined
Dec 18, 2014
Threads
16
Messages
220
Reaction score
58
Location
New Mexico
Vehicle(s)
2018 Mustang GT
Because Comp Cams posted the results. You lose considerate torque under the curve like a lot guys. I'm not just spitting crap. They posted graphs and their results with stage 2. Stage 3 are still in R&D finalization. But I'd rather have 450/420 with bolt ons than 465/360 with cams. Torque gives grins, that grunt is what makes us all smile.

This is the first I have heard of the results. Can you post a link as to where you found or read these results????
 

RubyRedBoost

Traded EB old name New GT
Joined
Dec 10, 2014
Threads
10
Messages
619
Reaction score
181
Location
Fort Worth
First Name
Josh
Vehicle(s)
2015 Guard GT with PP
I will concede that after looked for the information this morning it was NSR results I found that killed torque till after 5k rpm. I had also had a few too many brews and apologize for spreading misinformation. I eagerly wait the results and hope to be proved wrong. Under the curve power is what I like.
 

1320'

Well-Known Member
Joined
Aug 26, 2014
Threads
19
Messages
3,758
Reaction score
1,616
Location
Medford,Oregon
Vehicle(s)
2011 Avenger...sadly
I agree with this to an extent. Some cams require phaser limiters to avoid piston-to-valve contact. However there are plenty of cam options for the Coyote that do not require limiters and don't have any major drawbacks in torque production. For the '11-14 Coyotes you could install 'mini-CJ' exhaust cams which do nothing but increase duration from 260 to 290(stock 11mm lift) and they offer significant gains with no torque loss.
I dig the full on CJ cams, 13mm and 290. Ford has stated those cams fully meet the long term durability requirements for OEM. They were actually going to be the original Boss cams
 

Todd15Fastback

Well-Known Member
Joined
Dec 10, 2013
Threads
80
Messages
10,523
Reaction score
3,883
Location
Atlanta, GA
First Name
Todd
Vehicle(s)
2015 Mustang GT PP Fastback
I will concede that after looked for the information this morning it was NSR results I found that killed torque till after 5k rpm. I had also had a few too many brews and apologize for spreading misinformation. I eagerly wait the results and hope to be proved wrong. Under the curve power is what I like.
:cheers::thumbsup:
 

Grimace427

Well-Known Member
Joined
Dec 6, 2013
Threads
14
Messages
6,467
Reaction score
1,702
Location
NoVA
Vehicle(s)
2011 Mustang 5.0
I dig the full on CJ cams, 13mm and 290. Ford has stated those cams fully meet the long term durability requirements for OEM. They were actually going to be the original Boss cams

Yup they are pretty nice, requiring only some minor machining of the heads for clearance. Pretty pricey compared to just the Mini-CJ exhaust cams and I've only seen one person do the full CJ swap and didn't get the results he had hoped for.

I'm at work but I'll try to find his thread on the older forum when I get the chance.
Sponsored

 
 








Top