Sponsored

Cobra Jet intake install

Bambinv8

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jan 5, 2015
Threads
1
Messages
104
Reaction score
10
Location
Boynton Beach
Vehicle(s)
Waiting
I haven't track the car down here since is still 85* degrees with a 1500 DA. I will when weather gets better! But sorry to kill your vibe, we won't make 500whp or close to that on e85. You better use ftw fuel like the one jpc racing sells
Sponsored

 

Higgs Boson

Detonation Denotation
Joined
Oct 11, 2015
Threads
9
Messages
1,053
Reaction score
408
Location
Texas Hill Country
Vehicle(s)
19 GT350R
Is not going to make 500whp with cj, long tubes and e85. I will bet money on that! BTW the only guys making 480whp with a cj long tubes and supporting mods are using FTW FUEL that cost 175 $ for 5 gallons. The fuel Ben Calimer is using. That fuel is known to make 20whp over e85.
From another of my posts:

FTW is LEADED E100, not unleaded E85 so it stands to reason there is more power potential there but not a good idea with O2 sensors and/or cats.


VP C85
Specific Gravity: .793 @ 60°F
MON: 90
R+M/2: 98
RON: 106
Oxygen Content: 32.8% by weight


FTW Purple
Specific Gravity: .819
Type: Ethanol / Leaded
M.O.N.: 113
R+M/2: 116
R.O.N.: 119
o2 Content (By Weight): 31.6%


So you can see that the oxygenation level isn't exactly "heavy" as advertised. It is less oxygenated than VP C85 but is leaded with more ethanol and is advertised to use 10-15% more fuel than E96 (not 85).
 

mustang_guy

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jun 29, 2015
Threads
12
Messages
5,721
Reaction score
1,329
Location
United States
Vehicle(s)
it has an engine!
Is not going to make 500whp with cj, long tubes and e85. I will bet money on that! BTW the only guys making 480whp with a cj long tubes and supporting mods are using FTW FUEL that cost 175 $ for 5 gallons. The fuel Ben Calimer is using. That fuel is known to make 20whp over e85.
Just because you haven't heard of more people doing that with the 11-14 coyote doesnt mean youre right. You know all dynos put out different numbers, different DA. It all matters This motor makes more power and it will make "500" on stock cams. Btw you can keep your junky ftw fuel. Shell urt advanced is better. I can post a dyno of a 2015 making 470 on nothing but basic bolt ons and no upgraded manifold. For your arguments sake. What do you have to say now? Also i told you to stop focusing on stupid dyno variables. Focus on trap speed. That is the indicator of power
 

Bambinv8

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jan 5, 2015
Threads
1
Messages
104
Reaction score
10
Location
Boynton Beach
Vehicle(s)
Waiting
By you saying shell urt is better than ftw I can see I shouldn't bother anymore replying your posts as you show no idea what you're talking about. FYI, e85 out power shell urt
 

Bambinv8

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jan 5, 2015
Threads
1
Messages
104
Reaction score
10
Location
Boynton Beach
Vehicle(s)
Waiting
And lol at you posting a 470whp dyno sheet of a basic bolt on 5.0 2015.. Reminds me a company on Facebook stating they made 440whp on just a tuned 15 5.0
 

Sponsored

Bambinv8

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jan 5, 2015
Threads
1
Messages
104
Reaction score
10
Location
Boynton Beach
Vehicle(s)
Waiting
Jpc racing sets records using FTW FUEL not shell urt. Fastest all motor coyotes records have used ftw fuel. Google is your best friend " Mustang guy"
 

rozay

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 20, 2015
Threads
42
Messages
920
Reaction score
151
Location
South Florida, Broward
Vehicle(s)
2015 PQ 5.0 MT
Sorry but you won't see 500whp without cams
 

markmurfie

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jun 6, 2015
Threads
15
Messages
1,320
Reaction score
625
Location
Hawaii
First Name
Mark
Vehicle(s)
2015 Ford Mustang GT
Sorry but you won't see 500whp without cams
A Lund flex fuel tune doesn't make 500hp or even close with all that? :tsk: I would have expected it. What were you expecting?
 

rozay

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 20, 2015
Threads
42
Messages
920
Reaction score
151
Location
South Florida, Broward
Vehicle(s)
2015 PQ 5.0 MT
Full bolton E85 with cj mani. max would be 455-465 whp
 

mustang_guy

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jun 29, 2015
Threads
12
Messages
5,721
Reaction score
1,329
Location
United States
Vehicle(s)
it has an engine!
By you saying shell urt is better than ftw I can see I shouldn't bother anymore replying your posts as you show no idea what you're talking about. FYI, e85 out power shell urt
Shell urt is better then ftw. Ive personally used it before in my 4 digit builds. You get back to me when youve built your own 8 and 9 second cars. E85 does not out power shell urt advance . :lol:
 

Sponsored

markmurfie

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jun 6, 2015
Threads
15
Messages
1,320
Reaction score
625
Location
Hawaii
First Name
Mark
Vehicle(s)
2015 Ford Mustang GT
Full bolton E85 with cj mani. max would be 455-465 whp
Aren't there header intake stock manifold cars on 93 just a tad below those numbers? Dyno needs to be greased or have its oil changed or something. What's the deal?
 

mustang_guy

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jun 29, 2015
Threads
12
Messages
5,721
Reaction score
1,329
Location
United States
Vehicle(s)
it has an engine!
Jpc racing sets records using FTW FUEL not shell urt. Fastest all motor coyotes records have used ftw fuel. Google is your best friend " Mustang guy"
Im familiar with what justin uses. Thanks. I like how you automatically assume more power makes a fuel better. :lol:
Sorry but you won't see 500whp without cams
Disagree.
 

rozay

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 20, 2015
Threads
42
Messages
920
Reaction score
151
Location
South Florida, Broward
Vehicle(s)
2015 PQ 5.0 MT
Im familiar with what justin uses. Thanks. I like how you automatically assume more power makes a fuel better. [emoji38]


Disagree.
Show me someone with 500whp with basic Bolt ons
 

mustang_guy

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jun 29, 2015
Threads
12
Messages
5,721
Reaction score
1,329
Location
United States
Vehicle(s)
it has an engine!


450 without a manifold on the s550s isnt uncommon on 93 octane either. There are many variables, dynos read different, da etc. Too many people compare their dyno vs another guys in another part of the us and wonder why his is higher or lower. Personally i couldnt care less about dynos. The real indicator of power is trap speed. Someone will tip a dyno eventually at 500 with full bolt ons, e85 and a cj manifold. Especially when they get these new ecus dialed in better.
 

Bambinv8

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jan 5, 2015
Threads
1
Messages
104
Reaction score
10
Location
Boynton Beach
Vehicle(s)
Waiting
Aren't there header intake stock manifold cars on 93 just a tad below those numbers? Dyno needs to be greased or have its oil changed or something. What's the deal?
On happy dyno sure.... Not average, I mean I saw a company on Facebook stating they made 440 whp with just tune. And some long tubes headers cars on 93 making 450whp. When that's not the reality, I want to run a 450whp long tube header car on 93 vs my 456whp cj long tubes and e85 car :)
Sponsored

 
 








Top