This is the same thing I was told by a Ford Engineer.5W20 Mobile 1 Whipple
Any other weight causes issues with cam phase as the cam system is dependent on oil viscosity and Whipple tune is based on 5W20 from what I understand.
Change the weight = risk confuse ECU = possibly risk timing or power gets pulled?
I could be wrong but thought newest Whipple tune had some extra logic to try and compensate for errors caused by people changing viscosity?
+1 Whipple
Why run anything other than 5W20?
Good points below +1 all, yes if you are going to run a higher oil temp continuous track use then yes you might need oil that is lower viscosity at the new temperature you are running at. Since the oil cooler is built in and feed by coolant, that would mean running higher coolant temps?
If you go from 200-220 CHT of stock motor to running cooler 170-190 CHT using colder Tstat, might want to check your oil temps. If running 30-40F colder oil and also going to 40W... won't your oil pump need more torque(HP) and your flow will be lower?
I agree completely. Some of you may remember the cam phaser problems of the 3 valve mod motors (F150's, Mustangs) and running the wrong viscosity interfered with the phasers ability to adjust cam timing based off oil pressure. It also caused premature phaser and variable cam timing solenoid failure. Plus the tolerances of the main bearings and other various components are much tighter then the old pushrod motors that ran 10-30. Furthermore 5-20 will yield better fuel economy as well. But that's not why we drive these cars...5W20 Mobile 1 Whipple
Any other weight causes issues with cam phase as the cam system is dependent on oil viscosity. Change the weight = risk confuse ECU = possibly risk timing or power gets pulled?
