Sponsored

917WHP/1108fwhp @15lbs, Smoothboost

HKusp

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jul 22, 2021
Threads
37
Messages
2,251
Reaction score
2,889
Location
Hampton, Md.
First Name
Jason
Vehicle(s)
2018 Mustang GT
You can get a healthy idea of CHP by looking at MAF data. Every lb/min is roughly equal to 10 HP.

You can’t compare drivetrain loss vs a stock NA motor. You’re now turning a blower and at this power level it’s eating 50-60 CHP to turn at your HP peak. So your drivetrain loss will be higher than a stock engine. It’s obviously still worth the trade off. :)
That's actually a really good estimate of wheel HP, crank would usually be higher than 10.
Sponsored

 

Joshinator99

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 13, 2023
Threads
1
Messages
613
Reaction score
1,142
Location
Massachusetts
First Name
Josh
Vehicle(s)
2022 Mustang GT Premium, 2017 Camaro 2SS
That's actually a really good estimate of wheel HP, crank would usually be higher than 10.
Negative. I have many years of running my Camaro on the dyno and the airflow correlates nicely with crank HP. I currently run 123 lbs/min airflow which would be roughly 1230 CHP and dyno 1059 WHP which is a realistic number for a car that traps 153 MPH. It’s been a similar trend since I supercharged the car 6 years ago… only now the numbers are a bit bigger haha ;)

Edit: I always use load bearing dynos. You could be right on a Dynojet lol!
 

SolarFlare

Well-Known Member
Joined
Aug 24, 2015
Threads
76
Messages
4,145
Reaction score
2,403
Location
S. Fla
Vehicle(s)
2015 CO GT
Why do you assume converter is more than likely slipping? Should be clear as day, the log should show converter slip
Sponsored

 
 








Top