AZ18yote
Well-Known Member
I would say the opposite with so many fitment and quality issues.I haven't, I've seen more.good.than bad about their headers and I just figure how can you screw up an h pipe ???
Sponsored
I would say the opposite with so many fitment and quality issues.I haven't, I've seen more.good.than bad about their headers and I just figure how can you screw up an h pipe ???
As gasses cool and slow they wont need so much room and can actually become a restriction in itself. Granted you wont see as much benefit with stock headers but it will certainly be better than the puny 2.25" section for the resonator.So what the point of a 3” H pipe unless you run 3” from the collectors back?
Lethal performance exclusiveIt is part of thier cat back kits. 304 and 409 available. Have to call them as the part for just the H is not really advertised. I bought one after mine got damaged.
So gt500 doesn't need it, so nobody needs it?2.75” on the GT350’s and 500’s.
3.0” ? Who knows if 3.0” to the tailpipe is really needs. Fords GT500 team didn’t think so.
Steeda and a few others are making a 2.75” H crossover mid.
Who really knows.So gt500 doesn't need it, so nobody needs it?
You're post insinuated that since the gt500 was 2.75in, that's all was needed. At least that's the way it read.Who really knows.
Not many 2.75” aftermarket S550 systems out there to verify vs. 3.0”
Define Nobody.
I can see that.You're post insinuated that since the gt500 was 2.75in, that's all was needed. At least that's the way it read.
See the exhaust pressure thread.I can see that.
Yeah, I’d think power levels past a tuned GT500 is getting into the 1 or 2%’er’s. Big power = Big tubes.
It would be interesting to see the results of a 2.75” vs. 3.0” system with the same muffler internal design.
I have.See the exhaust pressure thread.