Sponsored

3" H-pipe

AZ18yote

Well-Known Member
Joined
Nov 24, 2017
Threads
11
Messages
3,221
Reaction score
1,531
Location
Arizona
First Name
Bryan
Vehicle(s)
2018 Mustang GT Prem PP Magnetic
I haven't, I've seen more.good.than bad about their headers and I just figure how can you screw up an h pipe ???
I would say the opposite with so many fitment and quality issues.
Sponsored

 

smokescreens

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jan 1, 2021
Threads
63
Messages
577
Reaction score
581
Location
michigan
First Name
jason
Vehicle(s)
2014 impala, 2017 HD. 2018 Royal C mustang gt pp1
So what the point of a 3” H pipe unless you run 3” from the collectors back?
As gasses cool and slow they wont need so much room and can actually become a restriction in itself. Granted you wont see as much benefit with stock headers but it will certainly be better than the puny 2.25" section for the resonator.
 

smokescreens

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jan 1, 2021
Threads
63
Messages
577
Reaction score
581
Location
michigan
First Name
jason
Vehicle(s)
2014 impala, 2017 HD. 2018 Royal C mustang gt pp1
It is part of thier cat back kits. 304 and 409 available. Have to call them as the part for just the H is not really advertised. I bought one after mine got damaged.
Lethal performance exclusive
 

GregO

Well-Known Member
Joined
Mar 5, 2018
Threads
41
Messages
3,320
Reaction score
2,470
Location
Illinois
Vehicle(s)
S550 GTPP
2.75” on the GT350’s and 500’s.
3.0” ? Who knows if 3.0” to the tailpipe is really needs. Fords GT500 team didn’t think so.
Steeda and a few others are making a 2.75” H crossover mid.
 

80FoxCoupe

Well-Known Member
Joined
Mar 28, 2018
Threads
51
Messages
5,469
Reaction score
6,157
Location
Cincy, OH
Vehicle(s)
16 GT, 80 Fox
2.75” on the GT350’s and 500’s.
3.0” ? Who knows if 3.0” to the tailpipe is really needs. Fords GT500 team didn’t think so.
Steeda and a few others are making a 2.75” H crossover mid.
So gt500 doesn't need it, so nobody needs it?
 

Sponsored

80FoxCoupe

Well-Known Member
Joined
Mar 28, 2018
Threads
51
Messages
5,469
Reaction score
6,157
Location
Cincy, OH
Vehicle(s)
16 GT, 80 Fox
Who really knows.
Not many 2.75” aftermarket S550 systems out there to verify vs. 3.0”
Define Nobody.
You're post insinuated that since the gt500 was 2.75in, that's all was needed. At least that's the way it read.
 

GregO

Well-Known Member
Joined
Mar 5, 2018
Threads
41
Messages
3,320
Reaction score
2,470
Location
Illinois
Vehicle(s)
S550 GTPP
You're post insinuated that since the gt500 was 2.75in, that's all was needed. At least that's the way it read.
I can see that.
Yeah, I’d think power levels past a tuned GT500 is getting into the 1 or 2%’er’s. Big power = Big tubes.
It would be interesting to see the results of a 2.75” vs. 3.0” system with the same muffler internal design.
 

80FoxCoupe

Well-Known Member
Joined
Mar 28, 2018
Threads
51
Messages
5,469
Reaction score
6,157
Location
Cincy, OH
Vehicle(s)
16 GT, 80 Fox
I can see that.
Yeah, I’d think power levels past a tuned GT500 is getting into the 1 or 2%’er’s. Big power = Big tubes.
It would be interesting to see the results of a 2.75” vs. 3.0” system with the same muffler internal design.
See the exhaust pressure thread.
 
 








Top