Sponsored

3.15 Gear Ratio -Why it is different-

JohnVallo

1 5 4 8 3 7 2 6
Joined
Feb 9, 2015
Threads
49
Messages
382
Reaction score
632
Location
Venice, FL
Website
racersreunion.com
First Name
John
Vehicle(s)
'16 GT350, Shadow Black, Whipple Supercharged
I will do my best to explain in detail why the 3.15 ratio setup isn’t compatible or doesn’t interchange with the other higher numerical gear ratio’s (i.e., 3.31, 3.55, 3.73 etc.), setups in the “Super 8.8” rear-end. -What’s Different? -

First of all, the -Bare Housing- in the “Super 8.8”, (the part that holds all the internals, and bolts to the subframe), whether it be aluminum, or cast iron, (ARE ALL INTERCHANGABLE).

Terminology:
If you are referring to the -Bare Housing with everything in it-, this is usually referred to as a “Loaded Carrier”, or “Pumkin”.
The “Differential”, or “Differential Carrier” should only refer to the part that the Ring-Gear bolts to whether it be “Trac-Loc”, or “Torsen” type.

So here are the exact differences between the 3.15 ratio setup, and the others (3.31, and up) in the “Super 8.8” rear-end.
The “Differential” itself is different with the 3.15 than with the others. Why? Read-on
The 3.15 pinion head (the part of the pinion that contains the teeth) is larger, than the others, Why? -It has more teeth- The pinion tooth count on the 3.15 is: 13, The pinion tooth count on the others (3.55, 3.73 etc.) is: 11

Left: a 3.15 Pinion gear: OD at head is: 112 mm, Right: a 3.73 Pinion gear: OD at head is: 98 mm
IMG_2175-1600x1200.webp


This larger diameter pinion head presents a problem. The 3.15 Ring-Gear now has to be spaced further away from the larger 3.15 pinion head. How did Ford accomplish this? They used a different Differential, with a different offset.

Left: a 3.15 Trac-Loc Diff., Right: a 3.31, and up, Trac-Loc Diff. The offset difference is: 8 mm
IMG_2174-1600x1200.webp


I won’t get into the deeper subject of “Differential Carrier Breaks”, and “Differential Carrier Deck Heights” now, but West Coast Differentials has a good description here:
https://www.differentials.com/technical-help-2/carrier-breaks/

The Ring-Gear’s physical size (in all the Factory ratio’s) are pretty similar in physical dimensions.

All “Super 8.8” Ring-Gears have same ID, OD, and bolt pattern, -they only vary slightly in thickness and tooth count-

Left: 3.15 Ring-Gear, Right: 3.73 Ring-Gear
IMG_2176-800x600.webp

IMG_2179-800x600.webp

IMG_2177-800x600.webp

IMG_2178-800x600.webp



Ratio, Pinion TC/Ring-Gear TC, Part Number

3.15, 13/41, Ford PN: JR3Z-4209-A
3.55, 11/39, Ford PN: FR3Z-4209-C
3.73, 11/41, Ford PN: FR3Z-4209-B
3.91, 11/43, Ford Performance PN: M-4209-88391A (May be Discontinued)
4.09, 11/45, Ford Performance PN: M-4209-88409A

Aftermarket (Super 8.8) Ring and Pinion gearsets have the following Tooth Counts:
4.11, 9/37
4.56, 9/41
4.88, 8/39

For more complete information on the "Super 8.8" rear-end see:
https://www.mustang6g.com/forums/threads/inside-the-super-8-8-rear-end.150514/
Sponsored

 

WD Pro

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jan 18, 2018
Threads
132
Messages
6,764
Reaction score
13,552
Location
United Kingdom
Vehicle(s)
Lime GT
Vehicle Showcase
1
I have a 4:09 off the car if you need any dimensions for comparison :like:

I wonder if a 8 or 9 tooth pinion (aftermarket) is considerably weaker than a 11 or 13 (OE Ford) ?

WD :like:
 

TeeLew

Banned
Banned
Banned
Joined
Apr 27, 2020
Threads
15
Messages
3,396
Reaction score
2,612
Location
So Cal
First Name
Tim
Vehicle(s)
Honda Odyssey, Toyota Tacoma, 89 GT project, 2020 Magnetic EB HPP w/ 6M
@JohnVallo What plate stack height should I be shooting for on either side of the diff? The Ford book gives a relatively wide range and I'm curious if you have a particulary 'good' setting?
 
OP
OP
JohnVallo

JohnVallo

1 5 4 8 3 7 2 6
Joined
Feb 9, 2015
Threads
49
Messages
382
Reaction score
632
Location
Venice, FL
Website
racersreunion.com
First Name
John
Vehicle(s)
'16 GT350, Shadow Black, Whipple Supercharged
@JohnVallo What plate stack height should I be shooting for on either side of the diff? The Ford book gives a relatively wide range and I'm curious if you have a particulary 'good' setting?
Some consideration may depend on what preload spring/springs you use. I thought I read about you were thinking of using or had used Belleville springs for preload.?
I don't have a recommended good setting, Go with your best guess.
 

TeeLew

Banned
Banned
Banned
Joined
Apr 27, 2020
Threads
15
Messages
3,396
Reaction score
2,612
Location
So Cal
First Name
Tim
Vehicle(s)
Honda Odyssey, Toyota Tacoma, 89 GT project, 2020 Magnetic EB HPP w/ 6M
I had to punt on the Bellevilles, but I have another little contraption that has a similar function to the S-spring with more oomph. That will be my first shot at preload. It has little coil springs that can be changed to adjust preload should the pain hit. I was more thinking about the individual stack heights, but maybe that will kind of shake out in the wash.
 

Sponsored

WD Pro

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jan 18, 2018
Threads
132
Messages
6,764
Reaction score
13,552
Location
United Kingdom
Vehicle(s)
Lime GT
Vehicle Showcase
1
I would guess for you guys where there are a lot of these things on salvage yards - get a full PP1 Torsen pumpkin from a M6 car and swap the full unit ?

WD :like:
 

Cobra Jet

Well-Known Member
Joined
Feb 12, 2015
Threads
771
Messages
17,565
Reaction score
19,997
Location
NJ
Vehicle(s)
2018 EB Prem. w/PP and 94 Mustang Cobra
I will do my best to explain in detail why the 3.15 ratio setup isn’t compatible or doesn’t interchange with the other higher numerical gear ratio’s (i.e., 3.31, 3.55, 3.73 etc.), setups in the “Super 8.8” rear-end. -What’s Different? -

First of all, the -Bare Housing- in the “Super 8.8”, (the part that holds all the internals, and bolts to the subframe), whether it be aluminum, or cast iron, (ARE ALL INTERCHANGABLE).

Terminology:
If you are referring to the -Bare Housing with everything in it-, this is usually referred to as a “Loaded Carrier”, or “Pumkin”.
The “Differential”, or “Differential Carrier” should only refer to the part that the Ring-Gear bolts to whether it be “Trac-Loc”, or “Torsen” type.

So here are the exact differences between the 3.15 ratio setup, and the others (3.31, and up) in the “Super 8.8” rear-end.
The “Differential” itself is different with the 3.15 than with the others. Why? Read-on
The 3.15 pinion head (the part of the pinion that contains the teeth) is larger, than the others, Why? -It has more teeth- The pinion tooth count on the 3.15 is: 13, The pinion tooth count on the others (3.55, 3.73 etc.) is: 11

Left: a 3.15 Pinion gear: OD at head is: 112 mm, Right: a 3.73 Pinion gear: OD at head is: 98 mm
IMG_2175-1600x1200.jpg


This larger diameter pinion head presents a problem. The 3.15 Ring-Gear now has to be spaced further away from the larger 3.15 pinion head. How did Ford accomplish this? They used a different Differential, with a different offset.

Left: a 3.15 Trac-Loc Diff., Right: a 3.31, and up, Trac-Loc Diff. The offset difference is: 8 mm
IMG_2174-1600x1200.jpg


I won’t get into the deeper subject of “Differential Carrier Breaks”, and “Differential Carrier Deck Heights” now, but West Coast Differentials has a good description here:
https://www.differentials.com/technical-help-2/carrier-breaks/

The Ring-Gear’s physical size (in all the Factory ratio’s) are pretty similar in physical dimensions.

All “Super 8.8” Ring-Gears have same ID, OD, and bolt pattern, -they only vary slightly in thickness and tooth count-

Left: 3.15 Ring-Gear, Right: 3.73 Ring-Gear
IMG_2176-800x600.jpg

IMG_2179-800x600.jpg

IMG_2177-800x600.jpg

IMG_2178-800x600.jpg



Ratio, Pinion TC/Ring-Gear TC, Part Number

3.15, 13/41, Ford PN: JR3Z-4209-A
3.55, 11/39, Ford PN: FR3Z-4209-C
3.73, 11/41, Ford PN: FR3Z-4209-B
3.91, 11/43, Ford Performance PN: M-4209-88391A (May be Discontinued)
4.09, 11/45, Ford Performance PN: M-4209-88409A

Aftermarket (Super 8.8) Ring and Pinion gearsets have the following Tooth Counts:
4.11, 9/37
4.56, 9/41
4.88, 8/39

For more complete information on the "Super 8.8" rear-end see:
https://www.mustang6g.com/forums/threads/inside-the-super-8-8-rear-end.150514/
Another awesome rear diff thread by @JohnVallo!,

Thanks for taking the time to not only post the tech, but provide actual comparison images.
 

SnowFox

Well-Known Member
Joined
Mar 22, 2021
Threads
63
Messages
973
Reaction score
1,124
Location
Mn
First Name
Grabber
Vehicle(s)
2022 GT, 2017 ECOboost, Saleen S351
Really appreciate this thread @JohnVallo it might be a slight bit old but it was exactly the information I needed explained perfectly.
Sponsored

 
 








Top