Sponsored

2018 Performance Pack - A big step BACKWARDS

FastCarFanBoy

Well-Known Member
Joined
Feb 21, 2016
Threads
4
Messages
772
Reaction score
511
Location
FL
Vehicle(s)
2013 GB GT
I'm starting to hate the GT350. It was cool and served a purpose 2yrs ago , but now it's performance has been matched by competitors costing thousands less, that aren't limited production. If Ford is hamstringing the GT's performance for the sake of the GT350 then they need to stop that crap immediately and either buff the GT350 or melt the rest down and move on.
Sponsored

 

RocketGuy3

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jul 27, 2014
Threads
40
Messages
1,404
Reaction score
925
Location
FL
Vehicle(s)
2021 Mach 1, 2025 GT4 RS, 2025 RS3
The PP is really that different in 2018? Really? What are these chassis stiffening updates? What are these refinements you speak of and what chassis tuning did they exactly make? Where are you getting your data from?

And if the PP has been updated as significantly as you elude too... has the gap been closed with the GT350? If so, where does the PP2 slot into?

My 2 cents... and I will come right out and say that it is pure speculation on my part: The PP likely remains pretty much unchanged. The PP2 will (hopefully) tighten the gap with the 1LE, but not match it, and certainly not overtake the GT350.
I could post the same question about data to you. What makes you so sure about the inferior performance of the GTPP? I'm going by what Ford has said -- that the base GT is now supposed to handle as well and be as stiff as the outgoing GTPP.
 

ApollosWar89

Analyst
Joined
Apr 12, 2017
Threads
3
Messages
347
Reaction score
67
Location
Houston
First Name
Cody
Vehicle(s)
In the Market
I'm starting to hate the GT350. It was cool and served a purpose 2yrs ago , but now it's performance has been matched by competitors costing thousands less, that aren't limited production. If Ford is hamstringing the GT's performance for the sake of the GT350 then they need to stop that crap immediately and either buff the GT350 or melt the rest down and move on.
Given its numbers, I've been saying this for awhile. The GT350 was the track car that Ford sells. It certainly wasn't for the acceleration or bragging rights in huge numbers. I believe that void in the Ford lineup will be filled with the next GT500. IMO of car enthusiasts, in the end, they care more about the acceleration and look of their car over its trackability.
 

Competition Orange

Well-Known Member
Joined
Aug 25, 2015
Threads
40
Messages
1,402
Reaction score
438
Location
Columbus, Ohio
Vehicle(s)
2017 GT350
I'm starting to hate the GT350. It was cool and served a purpose 2yrs ago , but now it's performance has been matched by competitors costing thousands less, that aren't limited production. If Ford is hamstringing the GT's performance for the sake of the GT350 then they need to stop that crap immediately and either buff the GT350 or melt the rest down and move on.
Keep in mind, however, that this mid cycle refresh is a pretty aggressive one, IMO. A noticeable bump in power, mag ride, active exhaust, even the base PP suspension is said to be a big step up from the 15-17s. Yes the price went up, and that sucks, but the S550 was never "faster" than the Camaro. Even the outgoing 5th gen was a match for it.

The GT350 is in its own world, I don't think it impacted anything on the 18. I bet it only helped it.
 

TomcatDriver

Well-Known Member
Joined
Mar 8, 2017
Threads
10
Messages
1,162
Reaction score
473
Location
Mojave Desert
Vehicle(s)
2017 GT350 Magnetic w/black stripes
I agree that those Michelin tires are a thousand times better than them dodgy Pirelli P-Zero Grip tires they used to have. But the difference in purchase cost is probably less than $25 per tire. So in no way that justifies a $1,000 price increase. And neither does that hideous new spoiler btw.
Exactly. It's not as if Ford still buys P-zeros and takes them off and throws them away. Same for the springs/sway bars etc. I would be surprised if the parts bin difference between base and PP parts is more than $500. I think people rightfully feel like they are being bent over.
 

Sponsored

slag1911

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 26, 2016
Threads
0
Messages
186
Reaction score
110
Location
NC
Vehicle(s)
2016 Mustang GT/PP
I could post the same question about data to you. What makes you so sure about the inferior performance of the GTPP? I'm going by what Ford has said -- that the base GT is now supposed to handle as well and be as stiff as the outgoing GTPP.
I have no data, which is why I prefaced my post with "pure speculation"... unlike you.

Also, my statement is that I believe the PP is being carried over largely unchanged... that should not infer "inferior performance"... it is a great package, especially at its old price point of $2450.

Again, IMO, PP is likely unchanged, GT350 is still top dog, and PP2 will fill a gap between the two. Will the PP2 meet or exceed a 1LE on the track? Again, IMO, no. The weight difference alone is damn near impossible to overcome.
 

TomcatDriver

Well-Known Member
Joined
Mar 8, 2017
Threads
10
Messages
1,162
Reaction score
473
Location
Mojave Desert
Vehicle(s)
2017 GT350 Magnetic w/black stripes
Keep in mind, however, that this mid cycle refresh is a pretty aggressive one, IMO. A noticeable bump in power, mag ride, active exhaust, even the base PP suspension is said to be a big step up from the 15-17s. Yes the price went up, and that sucks, but the S550 was never "faster" than the Camaro. Even the outgoing 5th gen was a match for it.

The GT350 is in its own world, I don't think it impacted anything on the 18. I bet it only helped it.
We will see when reviewers get their hands on them, but my guess is that we will see near equal performance at a higher price. My guess is a base GT is going to lose to a 1SS, but a PP will beat a 1SS, and to match a 1LE you are going to need magnaride which also buys you the PP+301A minimum which is going to cost more.
 

TomcatDriver

Well-Known Member
Joined
Mar 8, 2017
Threads
10
Messages
1,162
Reaction score
473
Location
Mojave Desert
Vehicle(s)
2017 GT350 Magnetic w/black stripes
I have no data, which is why I prefaced my post with "pure speculation"... unlike you.

Also, my statement is that I believe the PP is being carried over largely unchanged... that should not infer "inferior performance"... it is a great package, especially at its old price point of $2450.

Again, IMO, PP is likely unchanged, GT350 is still top dog, and PP2 will fill a gap between the two. Will the PP2 meet or exceed a 1LE on the track? Again, IMO, no. The weight difference alone is damn near impossible to overcome.
This is really my only hope for redemption in the current pricing. That is for PP2 to be a direct 1LE competitor, bundling PP+magnaride and maybe some interior improvements (maybe the only way to get cloth recarros?). Maybe (one can hope) that bundled it would be cheaper than ala carte. The only issue with that "hope" is that it would seem to make the stand alone magnaride option kind of pointless.

And yes, this is pure speculation.
 

scrubber3

Hopper, is that you?
Joined
May 10, 2017
Threads
17
Messages
611
Reaction score
212
Location
Sandhills NC
Vehicle(s)
2017 GTPP Shadow Black. 2001 Jeep XJ 4x4
Tires. I am telling you wholehearted that the tires the 1LE have on them make more of a difference than anything else the 1LE has that the Mustang PP has not. Once these Michelin tires get on the PP, it will get much closer.
 

nastang87xx

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jun 5, 2015
Threads
94
Messages
6,550
Reaction score
4,170
Location
San Diego, CA
Vehicle(s)
2016 GT350 Track Pack
For all of you guys blabbing about weight, a Camaro SS 1LE weighs in at around 3740lbs. Coolers, fluids, and bigger hardware comes at a cost. A base GT with a PP or PP2 option I'm guessing won't be that big of a weight difference. Also, MagneRide or MSRC hardly adds any weight at all, about 5 lbs if that.
 

Sponsored

Competition Orange

Well-Known Member
Joined
Aug 25, 2015
Threads
40
Messages
1,402
Reaction score
438
Location
Columbus, Ohio
Vehicle(s)
2017 GT350
The weight difference alone is damn near impossible to overcome.
Weight difference? As tested at C&D is 3747. I weighed my base GT PP at 3760lbs. Even the loaded cars are only about 100lbs more than the 1LE. The weight savings is vastly overblown between the 6th gen and s550.

http://www.caranddriver.com/reviews/2017-chevrolet-camaro-ss-1le-instrumented-test-review


We will see when reviewers get their hands on them, but my guess is that we will see near equal performance at a higher price. My guess is a base GT is going to lose to a 1SS, but a PP will beat a 1SS, and to match a 1LE you are going to need magnaride which also buys you the PP+301A minimum which is going to cost more.
I predict the PP2 car will be between the SS and the 1LE in terms of performance. I don't care about the base or PP1 cars, honestly.
 

slag1911

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 26, 2016
Threads
0
Messages
186
Reaction score
110
Location
NC
Vehicle(s)
2016 Mustang GT/PP
This is really my only hope for redemption in the current pricing. That is for PP2 to be a direct 1LE competitor, bundling PP+magnaride and maybe some interior improvements (maybe the only way to get cloth recarros?). Maybe (one can hope) that bundled it would be cheaper than ala carte. The only issue with that "hope" is that it would seem to make the stand alone magnaride option kind of pointless.

And yes, this is pure speculation.
In my ideal world, the PP2 would be a base GT w/ a tweaked PP suspension, larger rubber, rear brembo's, magneride, recaros, select exhaust, rear seat delete, and a revised tune / GT350 intake/TB.

A bump to 480HP and a weight reduction of 100 pounds... that would be interesting.
 

Ebm

Well-Known Member
Joined
Nov 21, 2016
Threads
66
Messages
3,033
Reaction score
1,331
Location
North Carolina
First Name
Guy
Vehicle(s)
'14 GT
.

I'm starting to hate the GT350. It was cool and served a purpose 2yrs ago , but now it's performance has been matched by competitors costing thousands less, that aren't limited production. If Ford is hamstringing the GT's performance for the sake of the GT350 then they need to stop that crap immediately and either buff the GT350 or melt the rest down and move on.
What a coincidence. That sounds really familiar... Guess that's how hierarchies work huh? GT350 hamstringing the GT. GT hamstringing the Ecoboost. Yep.
 

Kevin08

Well-Known Member
Joined
Nov 12, 2014
Threads
32
Messages
2,422
Reaction score
1,302
Location
Panhandle FL
First Name
Kevin
Vehicle(s)
19GT
What a coincidence. That sounds really familiar... Guess that's how hierarchies work huh? GT350 hamstringing the GT. GT hamstringing the Ecoboost. Yep.
Haha...you have a point. The EB could easily be a 350hp-370hp car, but then it would scur GTs.

Not many people will buy GTs anymore anyway.
 

Hack

Well-Known Member
Joined
Nov 26, 2014
Threads
86
Messages
12,801
Reaction score
8,209
Location
Minneapolis
Vehicle(s)
Mustang, Challenger
I'm starting to hate the GT350. It was cool and served a purpose 2yrs ago , but now it's performance has been matched by competitors costing thousands less, that aren't limited production. If Ford is hamstringing the GT's performance for the sake of the GT350 then they need to stop that crap immediately and either buff the GT350 or melt the rest down and move on.
As a GT350 owner I don't care a whole lot that the new GT automatic will be faster 0-60 than my car. I already have resigned myself to the fact that my car wasn't designed for quick 0-60. I was hoping for the new GT to make at least 480 hp. I don't think Ford is holding back for the GT350. I think they are just doing what they think they need to do to sell the Mustang. I think if Ford was holding back they wouldn't have made the new GT automatic so quick 0-60.

However, I guess we will know for sure in a couple years when the GT350 is gone. It's possible that the regular Mustang GTs will make 550 hp or even more at that time. I would be surprised, but I'd love it. And then we will know that Ford was waiting for the GT350 to go away before raising the power more.

Given its numbers, I've been saying this for awhile. The GT350 was the track car that Ford sells. It certainly wasn't for the acceleration or bragging rights in huge numbers. I believe that void in the Ford lineup will be filled with the next GT500. IMO of car enthusiasts, in the end, they care more about the acceleration and look of their car over its trackability.
I think you're probably right, but more as a percentage of GT350 buyers wanted the car to take to the road course. It's really good there. Not that a regular Mustang or GT isn't plenty of fun as well.
Sponsored

 
 








Top