Sponsored

1 3/4 vs 1 7/8 header comparison

Joined
Apr 9, 2016
Threads
4
Messages
14
Reaction score
0
Location
everett pa
Vehicle(s)
2016 gt premium pp
so im lookin into buying longtubes and i would like to see a side by side dyno comparison of a bolt on car with 1 3/4 and 1 7/8 headers and then a comparison on a boosted setup. im thinking on a bolt on car the 1 3/4 may be the way to go i realize that if ur looking for a bigger peak number u may get more with the 1 7/8 but thats not where we really need it with our cars, my opinion of course but if i could gain more power down low and only sacrifice a few hp up top thats what i would be after. i plan to supercharge the car tho over the winter so im curious as to how much the 1 3/4 may choke it at the 6-700 hp level. i realize this would be alot of work to find out on a dyno jus wondering if anyone has some insight.
Sponsored

 

MyLilPony

Naw It's Stock
Joined
Apr 15, 2015
Threads
47
Messages
1,613
Reaction score
657
Location
Prosper, TX
First Name
Kris
Vehicle(s)
2015 Black GT, 18 JLUR, 15 JK
If you plan to boost why even consider 1 3/4... Lots of other conversations on this topic but if you want an accurate comparison your best bet is to do it yourself with your car on your dyno in similar conditions. The difference at NA levels is nominal but you won't lose anything by going bigger.

As for boosted you pick up more HP with lower boost levels with 7/8 and headers make a huge difference in boosted applications so bigger is always better. So again, if you plan to go boosted why consider 3/4?
 

Weather Man

Persistance is a Bitch
Joined
Apr 4, 2016
Threads
7
Messages
1,131
Reaction score
1,027
Location
MN
Vehicle(s)
2015 I4 T Prem Auto
1 3/4 for n/a
 
OP
OP
Joined
Apr 9, 2016
Threads
4
Messages
14
Reaction score
0
Location
everett pa
Vehicle(s)
2016 gt premium pp
i realize that 1 7/8 might be better for a high rpm peak number with boost. no doubt that it would be better on a boosted app. but what about midrange where u spend most of the time in a street car. and i disagree about bigger is better. thats not true. theres alot more to it than jus a pipe size. u dont jus go putting the biggest intake, heads, and exhaust on any old engine and expect it to run better. everything has to be sized accordingly. i would like o jus see the differences between the 2 on paper to see what does what yanno.
 

Weather Man

Persistance is a Bitch
Joined
Apr 4, 2016
Threads
7
Messages
1,131
Reaction score
1,027
Location
MN
Vehicle(s)
2015 I4 T Prem Auto
i realize that 1 7/8 might be better for a high rpm peak number with boost. no doubt that it would be better on a boosted app. but what about midrange where u spend most of the time in a street car. and i disagree about bigger is better. thats not true. theres alot more to it than jus a pipe size. u dont jus go putting the biggest intake, heads, and exhaust on any old engine and expect it to run better. everything has to be sized accordingly. i would like o jus see the differences between the 2 on paper to see what does what yanno.
On supercharged modular cars over 800 HP space limitations make it very difficult to go to big. Working with 2 inch or bigger primaries gets very hard (and expensive). From what I have seen over the years, they do not give away much, if any, down low. If you could shoe horn in a 2 1/4, maybe the low end would suffer.

My 3V is getting a 3.4 whipple and will be using 1 7/8 with 3.5 collector ARH setup. I would have loved to step it to 2 inch, but costs get crazy for any expected HP increase.
 

Sponsored

Higgs Boson

Detonation Denotation
Joined
Oct 11, 2015
Threads
9
Messages
1,053
Reaction score
408
Location
Texas Hill Country
Vehicle(s)
19 GT350R
My 1050 hp C7 I have 1 7/8 headers.

unless you are going to have over 750 or 800 then you really don't need more than 3/4....
 
OP
OP
Joined
Apr 9, 2016
Threads
4
Messages
14
Reaction score
0
Location
everett pa
Vehicle(s)
2016 gt premium pp
yea space is another reason im leaning towards 1 3/4. im jus curious how much it would choke it in the higher rpms with boost. doubt low to mid would suffer much but 600rwhp is right about the borderline power level where 1 7/8 should be had.
 

Mike Jesse

Well-Known Member
Joined
Sep 19, 2015
Threads
4
Messages
97
Reaction score
24
Location
Bremerton, Wa.
Vehicle(s)
15 Mustang GT Premium
My concern is not the primary size, but rather the choke point at the end of collector.

Look at a full 3 in. exhaust from the end of the collector back.

I have not seen a test on this subject, be can only speculate that the neck down
to 2 1/4 in. dia. cannot be good.
Sponsored

 
 








Top