Sponsored

Autoblog's First Ride

Topnotch

Well-Known Member
Joined
Aug 1, 2012
Threads
592
Messages
4,565
Reaction score
3,782
Location
NYC
Vehicle(s)
2018 Mazda CX-9 Touring
http://www.autoblog.com/2014/05/16/2015-ford-mustang-ecoboost-first-ride-review/

DSCN4103.jpg


Earlier this week, Ford invited us to Charlotte, NC, to ride in an all-new 2015 Mustang fitted with its turbocharged 2.3-liter EcoBoost four-cylinder. It's the first forced-induction, four-cylinder ponycar for the Blue Oval since the sun set on the 1986 Mustang SVO. We jumped at the opportunity, as only a handful of people have ever been in the passenger seat of this new car, and most automotive media won't get as close as we did until this fall.

As we revealed in our Deep Dive, Ford will slot this new turbocharged four as premium powerplant between its naturally aspirated 3.7-liter V6 and the naturally aspirated 5.0-liter V8. At last mention, the automaker said the direct-injected, all-aluminum engine will develop 305 horsepower and 300 pound-feet of torque, returning the best fuel economy of the three powerplants in the process. History buffs will note that those figures are appreciably stouter than the 200 horses and 240 lb-ft that the '86 SVO realized out of the same displacement, and the latter's figures were hugely impressive at the time. On paper, the new EcoBoost four looks to be a good fit for most owners who want to balance performance with efficiency – we were eager to see how it felt from the passenger seat.

Riding Notes

  • Ford is continuously polishing its final product. The Mustang we rode in was a prototype, still in need of some final tweaks. Its interior was mostly complete, but many of the surfaces were lacking texture or constructed with the incorrect material – standard prototype fare.
  • A manual and a traditional automatic transmission will be offered at launch, with both containing six gears. While the standard trans is a carryover, the automatic has been upgraded with paddle shifters and is driver configurable with four different electronic modes (Normal, Sport, Track and Snow/Wet) that alter shift points, traction control and throttle response. Our test car was equipped with the automatic.
  • The steering effort may also be adjusted between three different settings (Comfort, Normal and Sport), thanks to its new electronically assisted rack.
  • Our car was optioned with a Performance Package that will be a must-have for enthusiasts. It includes firmer dampers and higher-rate springs (take a closer look and note that the 2015 model already rides a bit lower, with tighter wheel well gaps), chassis bracing, upgraded front bushings and stiffer sway bars (by about five percent). More capable four-piston brake calipers are fitted to the front axle over 13.8-inch ventilated rotors, while the rear brakes retain a single-piston sliding caliper over 13.0-inch ventilated discs. The package does nothing for the engine, but a new 3:55 rear axle ratio (replacing a 3:31) will make it feel a bit quicker. Lastly, a set of 19-inch alloys wrapped in performance-oriented Pirelli PZero rubber (255/40R19 at all four corners) improves grip.
  • Off-the-line acceleration wasn't tire-chirpingly quick, even in the sportiest setting, but once the engine was under full boost – we noted a bit more than 15 psi on the analog dial between the center HVAC vents – it started to pull strongly, wanting to stretch its legs. (Ambient temperatures were in the mid-90s, with equally high humidity, both of which work against a turbocharged powerplant.) The short autocross course limited the driver to just second gear, with the shift from first to second arriving smoothly. Our pilot demonstrated shifting in both automatic and manual modes, which features nifty rev-matching throttle-blips, and it never felt sharp, harsh or tiringly aggressive.
  • As is nearly always the case with a four-cylinder engine, the new 2.3-liter lacks the ultimate smoothness of a six or eight. At this stage of tune, however, it's no better or worse than the racket emanating from BMW's new four. There was a notable intake and exhaust note, both pleasantly tuned, but we couldn't catch any turbo whine in our short jaunt (Ford didn't allow us to pry open the hood and view the intake design). This Mustang's siblings will each have much better lungs, while the four will require some acclimating.
  • One big advantage a four-cylinder holds over a six- or eight-cylinder is reduced mass. During the parking lot autocross, the new Mustang felt impressively agile and light. There was very little body roll, even during extreme maneuvering (the car in this picture is cornering aggressively). Under heaving braking, the new chassis and sporty underpinnings – independent rear suspension and all – seemed to successfully resist the urge to dive or become unsettled. There was a bit of front-end push in the tightest sections, but applying the throttle quickly moved the weight rearward, extinguishing the understeer (the front of the coupe felt lighter than the rear, which would indicate good balance). We'd be willing to bet that the four will be the most nimble in the family.
  • It's likely that Ford sees even more potential in the idea of an EcoBoost Mustang – new spy shots and video revealed earlier today suggests that the company may be working on a model with even higher performance, though its cylinder count remains unclear.

In a nutshell, we climbed out of the passenger seat in Charlotte impressed. Three quick laps observed from the passenger side are no substitute for a thorough test drive, but we've sat right seat in hundreds of vehicles, with the majority of those being far less competent. Climbing behind the wheel of the 2015 Ford Mustang for ourselves can't come soon enough.
11-2015-ford-mustang-ecoboost-fr-1.jpg
Sponsored

 

GTsquid

Guest
Off-the-line acceleration wasn't tire-chirpingly quick, even in the sportiest setting, but once the engine was under full boost – we noted a bit more than 15 psi on the analog dial between the center HVAC vents – it started to pull strongly, wanting to stretch its legs. (Ambient temperatures were in the mid-90s, with equally high humidity, both of which work against a turbocharged powerplant.) The short autocross course limited the driver to just second gear, with the shift from first to second arriving smoothly. Our pilot demonstrated shifting in both automatic and manual modes, which features nifty rev-matching throttle-blips, and it never felt sharp, harsh or tiringly aggressive.
Which makes you wonder why they chose to show off the EB4. Anyway, at least they walked away impressed for the most part. I still think having a passenger in there (and actually being the passenger) had a big effect on these reviews.

Also wish the media would stop repeating this false info:

"At last mention, the automaker said the direct-injected, all-aluminum engine will develop 305 horsepower and 300 pound-feet of torque"
 

Fox9350

Well-Known Member
Joined
Dec 23, 2013
Threads
21
Messages
947
Reaction score
28
Location
Boston, MA area
Vehicle(s)
1993 5.0 GT (former car)
Also wish the media would stop repeating this false info:

"At last mention, the automaker said the direct-injected, all-aluminum engine will develop 305 horsepower and 300 pound-feet of torque"

I blame Ford for this idiocy. Even when the media actually gets it right (rarely) and they mention "more than" the only thing people remember is the number anyway. Ford needs to release the HP numbers and they need to do it yesterday.
 

Spartan

Well-Known Member
Joined
Apr 29, 2014
Threads
94
Messages
3,883
Reaction score
569
Location
MD
Vehicle(s)
Ford Explorer Sport
As is nearly always the case with a four-cylinder engine, the new 2.3-liter lacks the ultimate smoothness of a six or eight. At this stage of tune, however, it's no better or worse than the racket emanating from BMW's new four.
I wish Ford would get the tuning down for the EB4.

Right now it seems like everyone is coming back with the same reviews on the 2.3 ...which is kinda so-so.

It's obvious Ford is still tinkering with it because they won't let anyone under the hood OR drive it but I wish they would wait for these ride alongs till they have the 2.3 tuned the way they want it to be.

I am excited though that they think the 2.3 will be the nimblest of the family.

This though worries me...if this is true...then damn I want to wait

It's likely that Ford sees even more potential in the idea of an EcoBoost Mustang – new spy shots and video revealed earlier today suggests that the company may be working on a model with even higher performance, though its cylinder count remains unclear.
 

JoeDogInKC

Well-Known Member
Joined
Feb 11, 2014
Threads
18
Messages
1,994
Reaction score
28
Location
Kansas City, MO
First Name
Joe
Vehicle(s)
Triple Yellow 2015 GT Premium w/PP
As an owner of an '04 Mach 1, then 2 Coyotes (2011 and 2013), I can tell you that my Coyotes "felt" slower than the Mach 1 did with 100+ hp more. And the 4.6 modular in the Mach 1 didn't have the low end pull like the old 5.0's did. I personally think it's chassis tuning and the very fact that they don't feel it is actually a good thing.

Flat cornering, as mentioned in this review, is also stellar. They never got out of 2nd gear AND it was high temp/humidity. I really think people are going to be blown away by the EB4. I bet that it will beat the snot out of unmodified and even lightly modded 4.6's from New Edge to 2010.
 

Sponsored

ort895

Member
Joined
Apr 26, 2014
Threads
2
Messages
23
Reaction score
0
I'm not worried cause I'm coming from a 1.9l z3 so anything is an upgrade at this point.
 

genericuser1

Well-Known Member
Joined
Mar 25, 2014
Threads
0
Messages
194
Reaction score
2
Location
Mid-Atlantic
Vehicle(s)
2011 M3 convertible
Turbo to NA has or I should say can have a completely different feel. Drive a modified STI or Evo and is nothing, nothing, nothing and wham everything in a huge surge of torque.

With a well tuned twin scroll or twin turbo or NA engine it's a swell of power shoving you down the road.

Kinda of how a diesel feels much faster than it really is.
 

M.Senger

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 1, 2014
Threads
4
Messages
60
Reaction score
0
Flat cornering, as mentioned in this review, is also stellar. They never got out of 2nd gear AND it was high temp/humidity. I really think people are going to be blown away by the EB4. I bet that it will beat the snot out of unmodified and even lightly modded 4.6's from New Edge to 2010.
So that autocross track was so small that they never went over 100 kph. And for me the biggest turbo advantage is 100-250 kph accelaration. That's where flat torque curve is pulling strong.
 

JoeDogInKC

Well-Known Member
Joined
Feb 11, 2014
Threads
18
Messages
1,994
Reaction score
28
Location
Kansas City, MO
First Name
Joe
Vehicle(s)
Triple Yellow 2015 GT Premium w/PP
Well, we've heard that it will produce better low end torque than either of the other options, but I agree, the torque will come on strong in the upper range when both scrolls are spun up fully. For what it is, I think it's going to be a rocket. Someone put some really low guesstimates for 0 - 60 that I didn't agree with, but I think we'll see 5 - 5.5 seconds or thereabouts (it could dip into the 4's slightly) and with that flat torque curve and 300+ ft lbs of it, I think it's going to surprise some people just how fast it is.
 

Tony Alonso

Super Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Mar 31, 2013
Threads
177
Messages
4,257
Reaction score
1,519
Location
Cincinnati, OH USA
Vehicle(s)
'01/'09/'19 Bullitt, '90 GT, '00 Corvette FRC
I bet that it will beat the snot out of unmodified and even lightly modded 4.6's from New Edge to 2010.
It will be interesting to see how those torque curves look. My 2010 GT has 325ft-lb at the peak, which I think this new engine could likely approach closely (maybe match?).

Around town, I like the feel in the 2500-5000 RPM range of 4.6L 3V. If the EB4 has something similar to what I consider the last of the great entry-level V8s, it will be a hoot.

I would say it will be quite competitive for power and fun for cornering. Technology marches on...
 

Sponsored

Spartan

Well-Known Member
Joined
Apr 29, 2014
Threads
94
Messages
3,883
Reaction score
569
Location
MD
Vehicle(s)
Ford Explorer Sport
It will be interesting to see how those torque curves look. My 2010 GT has 325ft-lb at the peak, which I think this new engine could likely approach closely (maybe match?).

Around town, I like the feel in the 2500-5000 RPM range of 4.6L 3V. If the EB4 has something similar to what I consider the last of the great entry-level V8s, it will be a hoot.

I would say it will be quite competitive for power and fun for cornering. Technology marches on...
Do we have any idea if they are developing a 2.7 v4 EB (read that somewhere)?

Also if the 3.5 v6 EB that is in the trucks could be coming to the Mustang (it would obvious get better MPG then in a truck then what they have listed under the truck MPG).
 

M.Senger

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 1, 2014
Threads
4
Messages
60
Reaction score
0
Well, we've heard that it will produce better low end torque than either of the other options, but I agree, the torque will come on strong in the upper range when both scrolls are spun up fully. For what it is, I think it's going to be a rocket. Someone put some really low guesstimates for 0 - 60 that I didn't agree with, but I think we'll see 5 - 5.5 seconds or thereabouts (it could dip into the 4's slightly) and with that flat torque curve and 300+ ft lbs of it, I think it's going to surprise some people just how fast it is.
http://www.carmagazine.co.uk/Drives/Search-Results/First-drives/Ford-Focus-RS-2009-CAR-review/

Similar weight ( I'm guessing), FWD and 5.9s 0-100 kph, 5.7 0-60 mph.

We can be sure that 2.3 EB Mustang will have more power than this 2.5, 5 cyl. EB Focus RS. Look at the torque, there is a lot of it. And chip tuning of this RS gives another 50 lb ft of torque! As I said in some other thread we don't know if Ford will give us all the power in first production year of EB. There is surely a lot of potential in ecu-tune-alone or with some performance package. They were getting 420 HP from this Focus RS EB

http://www.carscoops.com/2013/04/jay-leno-is-impressed-by-420hp-tuned.html
 

Spartan

Well-Known Member
Joined
Apr 29, 2014
Threads
94
Messages
3,883
Reaction score
569
Location
MD
Vehicle(s)
Ford Explorer Sport
Well, we've heard that it will produce better low end torque than either of the other options, but I agree, the torque will come on strong in the upper range when both scrolls are spun up fully. For what it is, I think it's going to be a rocket. Someone put some really low guesstimates for 0 - 60 that I didn't agree with, but I think we'll see 5 - 5.5 seconds or thereabouts (it could dip into the 4's slightly) and with that flat torque curve and 300+ ft lbs of it, I think it's going to surprise some people just how fast it is.
I hope it's low 5's if possible high 4's.

I mean the 220 HP 2.0 T Audi A3 Quattro does 0-60 in just 5.8 seconds.

We better be well below that for almost 100 more HP and being a sports car.
 

JoeDogInKC

Well-Known Member
Joined
Feb 11, 2014
Threads
18
Messages
1,994
Reaction score
28
Location
Kansas City, MO
First Name
Joe
Vehicle(s)
Triple Yellow 2015 GT Premium w/PP
Yeah, that's AWD too though. However, yeah with ~100 additional HP, I think we're both right on with what this thing will do. All that said, I've seen references to the current 3.7L v6's doing 4.8-ish, and this will likely be faster than that, so it *could* go into the 4's easier than I thought.
 

WestRace

Well-Known Member
Joined
Sep 8, 2013
Threads
11
Messages
295
Reaction score
4
Location
SoCal
Vehicle(s)
E46 M3
Which makes you wonder why they chose to show off the EB4. Anyway, at least they walked away impressed for the most part. I still think having a passenger in there (and actually being the passenger) had a big effect on these reviews.

Also wish the media would stop repeating this false info:

"At last mention, the automaker said the direct-injected, all-aluminum engine will develop 305 horsepower and 300 pound-feet of torque"
I guess they are saving the best for last ... like a movie.
These first rides are coming in like a mini series. The last one, Ford finally pops up the hood ... revealing a TDI hybrid 1.0L engine :D.
Sponsored

 
 




Top