Bob Lob Law
Well-Known Member
That must be why they discontinued the voodoo and not the coyote.Spoke to Ford exec last weekend. He rolled his eyes at these opinions. They have simular failure rates
Sponsored
That must be why they discontinued the voodoo and not the coyote.Spoke to Ford exec last weekend. He rolled his eyes at these opinions. They have simular failure rates
From the start it was said the Voodo was only for the GT350. Many times it was said that once the car was gone, the engine was gone. The GT350 production was supposed to end in 2019. It was extended to 2020 so that the GT350 and the GT500 would be in showrooms together for 1 year.That must be why they discontinued the voodoo and not the coyote.
Several of us who worked on Voodoo are on here. Sounds like this exec wasn't close to the project...Spoke to Ford exec last weekend. He rolled his eyes at these opinions. They have simular failure rates
Can you give us a ballpark comparison of failure rates since you are intimately familiar?Several of us who worked on Voodoo are on here. Sounds like this exec wasn't close to the project...
I get it. You are saying that your job is more important than my NEEDS. It's ok. I understand. Really I do.I still work at the company, so no numbers. Regardless of the stats, Voodoo is a hell of an engine, and owners should just enjoy it.
I had the same mindset… 350 handling and transmission + 500 power = ESS Mach 1.The GT350 was a great car. I loved my 17GT350 when I had it. I hated it when my Engine went boom. I really hated it when I had to fight with my dealer about why it went boom. It took Ford sending an engineer to prove that it was not my fault, it went boom.
So with all that in mind, that is the reason I started to seek another vehicle after I mistakenly sold my GT500, I looked at a GT350R, but then decided against it. Yes, you can get an extended warranty and go send it. Yes, you should not have to worry about the engine going boom, but for those of us that has experienced this first hand, it's not something I want to volunteer to do over.
My goal was to row gears again, so the GT500 was out when I started to look. GT350 was eliminated because I could not find a GEN2, and the ones I did, I was not going to pay the cost people/dealers were asking for. So I settled on looking at Mach1's or the DH S650. The Mach 1 was nice. Getting a lot of good vibes for the vehicle. The DH, well, after some investigation, was basically built to be the 350 modern replacement. Is it as raw as a GT350? No. I honestly believe nothing could replace the feeling the GT350 gives. Is it a fun vehicle? Yes. very much so with the tremic in it.
So in the end, I settled on a 2024 DH. Had some bits added, and now I have the rowing of a GT350, the handling of R, and the power of a GT500. My Dark Horse is now my WarHorse, and I am loving it.
If you want to see what makes it my WarHorse, go on over to 7G and look at the Dark Horse build:WarHorse thread.![]()
ermahgerd, same!I had the same mindset… 350 handling and transmission + 500 power
To be fair there seems to be a number of failures in the GM 6.2 liter motors in the trucks, Escalades and CT5 BWs…..think it’s rod bearings taking a vacation. We will see the full unredacted Epstein files before Ford ever shows the number of failures and reasons for in the Voodoo engine.
My reply to the 6.2 Issues. Not sure if I quoted it right, but here is the additional context.They were dropping lifters due to the AFM/DOD system in order to "increase" efficiency of their fuel ratings with the EPA. Even the manuals had the same lifters as the auto, but did not share the same tune to activate due to the difference in transmission operations. The failures were mostly noted in the COVID production iterations of the 6.2 despite having earlier reporting on the trucks with the same engine. My main reason why I no longer sought the 1LEs.