mikedahammer
Well-Known Member
- Thread starter
- #556
This probably close to the end of the line for me. As for the opposite precedence, hopefully this will help other people prepared to address the short falls with my case. To lose because the car went too fast or to a Merriam Webster's dictionary is a little disheartening.I think the arbitrator is blind to the situation at hand.
Unfortunately, this now sets the opposite precedence expected where this case could be referenced to deny any other similar claims put forth by others with similar failures while using their vehicle in similar events.
I think OP should still pursue, but at what cost and time?
Sponsored
Last edited: