Paxton 3.33, E85, stock motor glory pull

Slamdcoop0428 said:

I trapped 147 a couple weeks after i got off the dyno that i made 771whp at 14psi

Click to expand...

With a whole lot of weight reduction too no?

Was the K member and brakes done at that time?

gearhead2685 said:

With a whole lot of weight reduction too no?

Was the K member and brakes done at that time?

Click to expand...

Only thing i had for that pass was the front brakes done. Still had stock rear brakes and stock k member.

Slamdcoop0428 said:

Only thing i had for that pass was the front brakes done. Still had stock rear brakes and stock k member.

Click to expand...

Trap speed went down with the JTB and more weight reduction than the 147mph pass?

Slamdcoop0428 said:

I trapped 147 a couple weeks after i got off the dyno that i made 771whp at 14psi

Click to expand...

Weight reducted

gearhead2685 said:

Trap speed went down with the JTB and more weight reduction than the 147mph pass?

Click to expand...

9.3 at 147 pass was in negative 200 DA and 55 degrees with a 1.35 60ft, basically perfect conditions...

JTB 9.2 at 146 was 1500 DA and 75 degrees out with a 1.41 60ft

Trust me the JTb was faster and showed it. But who cares now as i just finished bolting on my twins and started my initial logs.

Slamdcoop0428 said:

9.3 147 pass was in negative 200 DA and 55 degrees.

JTB 9.2 at 146 was 1500 DA and 75 degrees out.

Trust me the JTb was faster and showed it. But who cares now as i just finished bolting on my twins and started my initial logs.

Click to expand...

Juan day I'll be cool and have twins

VRP said:

Juan day I'll be cool and have twins

Click to expand...

Im in love again lol. This is my 4th turbo mustang. Centri setup was not what i am use to at all. But it served me well id say.

christian said:

Mine was 803 @ 14 psi with the 3.40....stock manifold on E85. Since putting the 3.33 on, it feels much stronger. I think the 875 is within reason with the 350 mani. I’ll do mine in the spring and see where it is now. Awesome numbers man!!

Click to expand...

Was it the 3.40 or 3.38?

kcc0521 said:

Was it the 3.40 or 3.38?

Click to expand...

I agree a LOT of guys are not taking into consideration that the gt350 manifold is the reason his boost is down a little over what a stock manifold would be.They are guys making 850 with the 3.33 pulley and stock manifold so it's not impossible with real good air and a nice dyno to run them nuumbers.

Yes, go to the track and see what an almost 900whp number gives you. If you you trap in the 130’s. Well i got news for you..

Slamdcoop0428 said:

Im in love again lol. This is my 4th turbo mustang. Centri setup was not what i am use to at all. But it served me well id say.

Click to expand...

Get your ass to the track asap, I can't wait to see this thing in the 8's! I was hoping for you to break the 8's with the JT-B but I totally understand the switch, I miss daily driving turbos I'm wanting to do the same so bad!

Tommy V said:

I agree a LOT of guys are not taking into consideration that the gt350 manifold is the reason his boost is down a little over what a stock manifold would be.They are guys making 850 with the 3.33 pulley and stock manifold so it's not impossible with real good air and a nice dyno to run them numbers.

Click to expand...

My friend with the exact same setup as me (except he has cat deletes, I have headers) made 816whp through a 6R80 the exact same day I made 850 through the MT82. He's trapping 145/46 (I can't go out until spring). Both of us are 3.33 on the stock intake with E85. I only spun my car to 7500 due to limited fueling, but I think I could make a bit more with a 7850 redline. Add a Boss or 350 intake and I would hope for a decent bump in power with little to no change in boost pressure.

Also, unlike what I have been told, my power did not fall off at any point past 7000RPM with the stock manifold. I'd like to think I am forcing enough air in there to overcome the deficiency of the stock manifold and a better flowing part will really help the combo shine.

Slamdcoop0428 said:

Yes, go to the track and see what an almost 900whp number gives you. If you you trap in the 130’s. Well i got news for you..

Click to expand...

We don't all get negative DA track days and drive autos...and I bet with a mani and revving to 7700 you'd make 850 too. I doubt every dyno that's seen an 850 paxton car is turned up.

always said it, always will, best bang for the buck kit out there hands down,

it's a killer setup for the $$

Slamdcoop0428 said:

Yes, go to the track and see what an almost 900whp number gives you. If you you trap in the 130’s. Well i got news for you..

Click to expand...

I did 137mph with stock cats @ 4000lbs in 55* temps... on power level in my sig lol, Im gonna pulley down to 3.40 and see what she makes and hope the little paxton doesn't fail again!