thePill
Camaro5's Most Wanted
- Joined
- Aug 13, 2012
- Threads
- 37
- Messages
- 6,561
- Reaction score
- 699
- Location
- Pittsburgh
- Vehicle(s)
- S550
- Thread starter
- #2,716
What bothers me most about the z28 is the recommendations for Track Alignment.
The z28's calls for a 2-3 degree increase in... sit down...
Caster... Yes... The manual suggest that you increase the caster from 4.9 degrees to 7-8 degrees in the front alone. Among many other suggestions...
Ok... I'm not up to speed on these Multimatic F1 Struts so let me know if these crazy things somehow increase the caster... Probably not right???
My concern IS, Chevy likely had the suspension optimized for these unsupervised Track events. Like Nurburgring and the 38 test Motor Trend did... I believe they are optimizing the geometry before hand. The Ring was likely set up to these conditions as well. Probably exactly where they honed them in from.
Does anyone have any clue how much needs to change to increase caster on a MacP system by 2-3 degrees? Plates?
Edit: The z06 test comes to mind... The alignment shop at Chevy forgot to check the alignment... Well, at first I found humor in that... What exactly do they do at the alignment shop... Then I look at the Track settings for the camber, caster and toe. Ah Ha!!! They were upping the ante!!! Track specific geometry...
It's possible other manufacturers do this, it's a bad practice. However, Chevy took it a step further. Usually the cars are prepped to the track and then run. Chevy got to prep, run, re-prep and re-run, re-run, re-run until they won.
The z28's calls for a 2-3 degree increase in... sit down...
Caster... Yes... The manual suggest that you increase the caster from 4.9 degrees to 7-8 degrees in the front alone. Among many other suggestions...
Ok... I'm not up to speed on these Multimatic F1 Struts so let me know if these crazy things somehow increase the caster... Probably not right???
My concern IS, Chevy likely had the suspension optimized for these unsupervised Track events. Like Nurburgring and the 38 test Motor Trend did... I believe they are optimizing the geometry before hand. The Ring was likely set up to these conditions as well. Probably exactly where they honed them in from.
Does anyone have any clue how much needs to change to increase caster on a MacP system by 2-3 degrees? Plates?
Edit: The z06 test comes to mind... The alignment shop at Chevy forgot to check the alignment... Well, at first I found humor in that... What exactly do they do at the alignment shop... Then I look at the Track settings for the camber, caster and toe. Ah Ha!!! They were upping the ante!!! Track specific geometry...
It's possible other manufacturers do this, it's a bad practice. However, Chevy took it a step further. Usually the cars are prepped to the track and then run. Chevy got to prep, run, re-prep and re-run, re-run, re-run until they won.
Sponsored