austinnh
Well-Known Member
- Thread starter
- #1
I've been lurking here for a while. Since I'm moving out of the city in two months it's time to take action toward buying a car. The Mustang seems like the clear choice for my driving needs. I'm 90% sure it will be an Ecoboost and 100% sure it will be a manual transmission. Regarding color, I'm torn between Oxford White and Deep Impact Blue. I'm also torn about the 50 year appearance package (as well as premium trim in general). I don't want the performance pack because I don't want summer rubber and I think I would actually prefer a more "accessible" performance envelope, if you know what I mean. So my two questions are...
1) I've looked at both Oxford White and Deep Impact Blue in pictures. It seems to me DIB shows the contours of the car a bit better, while I like the stark understatedness of OW. I haven't seen either color in the metal so I'm interested in input. Which looks better in real lighting conditions? Does my feeling that DIB shows the contours better translate to real life? Which one will look better after it's scratched and dirty?
2) I'm considering the 50 year appearance package and it seems to come with slightly wider wheels. I guess I feel I would slightly prefer narrower tires for a few reasons. Not least because it will be a bit easier for me to find the edge of the performance envelope, if I ever want to ;) but also I imagine narrow tires would produce less road noise and more efficiency. Not to mention it would be a bit easier to carry a full-size spare, which I fully intend to do. Can anyone comment on this? Are these considerations disconnected from reality? Any other comments regarding the 50 year trim are welcome.
1) I've looked at both Oxford White and Deep Impact Blue in pictures. It seems to me DIB shows the contours of the car a bit better, while I like the stark understatedness of OW. I haven't seen either color in the metal so I'm interested in input. Which looks better in real lighting conditions? Does my feeling that DIB shows the contours better translate to real life? Which one will look better after it's scratched and dirty?
2) I'm considering the 50 year appearance package and it seems to come with slightly wider wheels. I guess I feel I would slightly prefer narrower tires for a few reasons. Not least because it will be a bit easier for me to find the edge of the performance envelope, if I ever want to ;) but also I imagine narrow tires would produce less road noise and more efficiency. Not to mention it would be a bit easier to carry a full-size spare, which I fully intend to do. Can anyone comment on this? Are these considerations disconnected from reality? Any other comments regarding the 50 year trim are welcome.
Sponsored