Ford Racing ProCal Tune

[TurboStang18]

FRPP told me they were shipping to performance parts dealers already, but the only place I could find who has it for sale right now is
https://www.levittownfordparts.com/...p?keywords=M-9603-M4C&search_in_description=1
I'm going to give their parts department a call right now to verify.

Sponsored

 

[justme97]

Do we know if it comes with a air filter? The Ford performance site itself doesn't reference an air filter.

 

[TurboStang18]

Levitttown says they are expecting a shipment this week. I just purchased it off their website after speaking with their parts department to verify availability. Should get it late next week. Don't know if it comes with an air filter.
I will post review once I install it.

 

[Cardude99]

Graph is now posted on the FRP page... pardon the screen capture from my phone...

Can you post the link please?

 

[lawrencecar]

https://performanceparts.ford.com/part/M-9603-M4C

 

[RichBrew]

only 250 WHP tuned? Am I the only one who thinks that doesn't sound right? I estimated the stock tune as better than that.

 

[SVO MkII]

only 250 WHP tuned? Am I the only one who thinks that doesn't sound right? I estimated the stock tune as better than that.

Yes, that looks odd. But they show the stock tune at 229 WHP. I think the value of the graph is showing the relative improvements (i.e., +9%, ect), not the absolute value, and at what revs.

 

[TicTocTach]

The image also doesn't upsize when you click on it and the resolution sucks... maybe they didn't intend for folks to zoom in, but who doesn't zoom in on porn?

 

[Cardude99]

who doesn't zoom in on porn?

Some things can not be unseen, tread carefully

 

[TicTocTach]

Some things can not be unseen, tread carefully

True... a 250hp tune would be pretty offensive...

 

[fourmustangs]

wonder why no air filter upgrade at $405 not awful at 15-20hp and 50lbft

 

[white15gt]

True... a 250hp tune would be pretty offensive...

Gotta remember wheel hp and crank are much different.

 

[TicTocTach]

Gotta remember wheel hp and crank are much different.

Yeah, I’m aware of drivetrain losses, but I don’t have a feel for how high they are for these cars. Old school stuff used to ballpark 15% for manual transmission cars, and if you assume the same on my EBPP that’s 46.5hp... the tune would have lost 13.5hp over stock...

 

[RichBrew]

Yeah, I’m aware of drivetrain losses, but I don’t have a feel for how high they are for these cars. Old school stuff used to ballpark 15% for manual transmission cars, and if you assume the same on my EBPP that’s 46.5hp... the tune would have lost 13.5hp over stock...

Heres a dyno from a stock 2018 A10... (265whp)

https://www.mustangecoboost.net/thr...-dyno-1-4-mile-times.15473/page-4#post-196145

 

[TicTocTach]

Wow... that's a pretty good ballpark... Great datapoints in that thread, too. I haven't had a chance to put mine on the dyno yet, but I will shortly after I get the 10K mile once-over done.

What I'm really liking from that dyno graph is the TQ numbers... 363 lb-ft @ 2950 rpm is outstanding considering the advertised rating of 350 lb-ft. I wonder if the A10 rates higher due to torque multiplication by the torque converter, or if Ford took a page from the old Mopar sandbagging playbook and chose a specific RPM to report the torque rather than the actual peak TQ?

A tune that resulted in an actual 300+ RWHP and 400+ RWTQ would be just outstanding from my perspective. I'm not looking to set records with my daily driver, but those numbers would be an absolute treat to drive.

Sponsored