Full-Race Geoff
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Dec 17, 2013
- Threads
- 1
- Messages
- 136
- Reaction score
- 139
- Location
- Phoenix, AZ
- Website
- www.full-race.com
- First Name
- Geoff
- Vehicle(s)
- 2015 Mustang EcoBoost
- Thread starter
- #16
we have some info in the ecoboost article on our site, the photo below clearly shows the flow paths:
To answer your question, you are completely correct. The port angle visually appears different but has comparable flow paths. The reason is our cyl 2/3 cross sections are taken at the flat of the cyl head. the cyl 1/4 cross section visually appears to larger from the merge angle (dictated by the casting). Overall they are pretty close - but there is definite gains from head porting, particularly behind the valves. Our turbo kit benefits from proper head prep but certainly not mandatory. we still have the 100% oem original motor in our car
To answer your question, you are completely correct. The port angle visually appears different but has comparable flow paths. The reason is our cyl 2/3 cross sections are taken at the flat of the cyl head. the cyl 1/4 cross section visually appears to larger from the merge angle (dictated by the casting). Overall they are pretty close - but there is definite gains from head porting, particularly behind the valves. Our turbo kit benefits from proper head prep but certainly not mandatory. we still have the 100% oem original motor in our car
Sponsored