- Joined
- Dec 20, 2014
- Threads
- 171
- Messages
- 1,399
- Reaction score
- 635
- Location
- Lake Worth, FL
- Website
- www.uprproducts.com
- Vehicle(s)
- 15 GT
Good to know if the results for the Holley is ever released with results.Have not tested it yet. Recently swapped the one on mine to AirAid and it worked with a different coupler. I don't see why it can't be the same with this one.
Good to know if the results for the Holley is ever released with results.
Is it possible to purchase the maf sensor separate and use it on a same diameter but different aftermarket intake? For example Steeda or JLT with insert removed and MAF from PMS.
Seeing how I posted this thread saying we offer it.. Have you tried calling us?If any vendors are running special please send me a PM, i'm ready to purchase the non-tune version. maybe i can do before and after dyno as well since i haven't dyno'd my car yet.
im guessing he wants it cheaper than the price you are offering..do you have them in stock?Seeing how I posted this thread saying we offer it.. Have you tried calling us?
561-588-6630
Looks like the PMAS and JLT is running 120 mm diameter tubes for the maf housing. So if thats the case maybe you guys can sell the maf sensor for jlt intake owners which does not want to tune but gain max performance? Any other intakes running 120 mm dia maf housing?The MAF is calibrated to the tube size which differs from other brands.
How about no. And pmas entire tube stays larger then jlts. Jlts tube is not optimized the way pmas is. If you want pmas technology buy pmas. If not go jlt. This isnt lets make a deal with pmas. Its a pretty rude suggestion you haveLooks like the PMAS and JLT is running 120 mm diameter tubes for the maf housing. So if thats the case maybe you guys can sell the maf sensor for jlt intake owners which does not want to tune but gain max performance? Any other intakes running 120 mm dia maf housing?
Yep. This is a very special intake--it's one of a kind. The research and design behind it is top notch, and while I can't speak for the research done on other intakes UPR has clearly put a lot into this product. You can't just part it out and combine pieces of other units because you'll end up with a trash version of multiple CAI's. The specialness of the PMAS can't be gained with other intakes by mixing parts.Seems like there's a whole lot of not grasping the concept going on here. PMAS has stated way their product is superior. Reading and Comprehension are lacking in this thread.
There is a guy using this intake and a lund flex fuel running 11.8s with a slipping clutch at 119-120s. However he also did an x pipe mod and muffler delete. But thats pretty minimal for power. I dont believe hes on the board. Hes manual and running slicks also.Yep. This is a very special intake--it's one of a kind. The research and design behind it is top notch, and while I can't speak for the research done on other intakes the PMAS has clearly put a lot into this product. You can't just part it out and combine pieces of other units because you'll end up with a trash version of multiple CAI's. The specialness of the PMAS can't be gained with other intakes by mixing parts.
I'd still like to see some independent dynos or time slips with the PMAS unit vs Stock though, but what I've seen so far is hard to argue with.