Sponsored

GT350 Intake Dyno..ENJOY!

5ABI VT

Well-Known Member
Joined
Oct 6, 2015
Threads
34
Messages
799
Reaction score
263
Location
Gta
Vehicle(s)
2015 mustang GT

Grim12

Well-Known Member
Joined
Oct 23, 2015
Threads
11
Messages
352
Reaction score
71
Location
NJ
Vehicle(s)
2016 GTPP
Very impressed. Can't wait to see this intake with long tubes. Makes for a nice N/A upgrade path. Intake, then headers (or the reverse). Then cams or GT350 heads/cams.
 

steph93lx

Well-Known Member
Joined
Sep 30, 2014
Threads
17
Messages
461
Reaction score
188
Location
Montreal area
Vehicle(s)
2018 GT 301A A10, Modded N/A 1993 coupe 5.0L
Thanks for all the trouble! Seem like a fantastic mod to try:thumbsup:

One thing is very weird . Your stock intake peak et 6800 rpm. My car and about every other I seen peak around 6500. Even with long tube that's my peak. You said you put your limiter at 7600 but clearly it show 7300.

Is it possible that for whatever reason the dyno data is off by 300rpm :shrug:

But that change nothing for the result. Seem like it pick-up everywhere impressive!

Thanks again:thumbsup:
 

markmurfie

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jun 6, 2015
Threads
15
Messages
1,158
Reaction score
503
Location
Hawaii
First Name
Mark
Vehicle(s)
2015 Ford Mustang GT
The driveability for the most part is good, lund and i are still going over datalogs to get this spot on for his repository...other than some minute part throttle surge below 3k everywhere else is spot on
Keep us posted on the part throttle. WOT is the easy part of Tuning. Part throttle especially with IMRC can be tricky. I have confidence in Lund if anyone can get it dialed in he can do it.
 

Sponsored

OP
OP

sandeale

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 10, 2015
Threads
3
Messages
356
Reaction score
335
Location
North Carolina
Vehicle(s)
2015 GT Premium PP
The rpm difference is because i adjuted it with the handheld not through lunds initial tune inputs and he confirmed that it causes erratic and unpredictable results i.e. the lower than expected limiter, but the new 7800 limit is coded in by lund and it does in fact pull to 7800, regarding the power peak, it baffled my previous tuner as well, because the car exhibited the same peak on a different dyno, no clue as to why
 
OP
OP

sandeale

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 10, 2015
Threads
3
Messages
356
Reaction score
335
Location
North Carolina
Vehicle(s)
2015 GT Premium PP
Regarding the clutch, so far so good i just need to install a shift light because theres no layover to indicate that its time to shift, and im damn near out of usable tach

Regarding the surge, after only 1 revision he has already almost eliminated it, it still there but really faint and for a much shorter duration in each gear, he said with a little more work it can be tuned out further but probably not entirely because the gt350 exhibits this surge as well (something with the throttle body calibration)
 

Grim_Reaper

'Merica
Joined
Nov 22, 2014
Threads
42
Messages
1,370
Reaction score
428
Location
United States
First Name
Dylon
Vehicle(s)
2021 Mustang GT Premium California Special 10-spd
I feel like that's a bit lean at WOT. Is the car just running out of injector?
I may be wrong, but the higher the number the more lean it is. The optimal/regular WOT AFR is usually 14.2 for my car, so wouldn't 11's be more rich?

It's always been my understanding that you want anywhere from 11-14 WOT for AFR. Unless you are running E85 where the guys have 8-9 AFRs
 

Jon B.

Farm Truck
Joined
Nov 23, 2014
Threads
4
Messages
127
Reaction score
17
Location
North Carolina
Vehicle(s)
'15 Premium PP GT, '01 Lightning
I'm referring to it as leaner than it "should" be. I don't know if they're targeting that or what, but I figured a targeted number of 10.9 or so would be where he wants to be.
 

Sponsored
OP
OP

sandeale

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 10, 2015
Threads
3
Messages
356
Reaction score
335
Location
North Carolina
Vehicle(s)
2015 GT Premium PP
The coyote likes a rather rich afr at wot ideally .84 lamda (11.8xx)
 
OP
OP

sandeale

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 10, 2015
Threads
3
Messages
356
Reaction score
335
Location
North Carolina
Vehicle(s)
2015 GT Premium PP
Yeah most other n/a applications prefer around 12.5 - 12.8, which got some initial tuners in trouble when the coyote debuted
 

Nataphen

Well-Known Member
Joined
Nov 17, 2014
Threads
4
Messages
1,063
Reaction score
301
Location
DFW
Vehicle(s)
2013 Mustang GT
0.83-0.88 lambda at WOT is in the good range for the NA Coyote depending on whether you're running ethanol or not.
 

Moddiction

Well-Known Member
Joined
Oct 20, 2015
Threads
82
Messages
1,809
Reaction score
341
Location
Mooresville, NC
Vehicle(s)
2016 Mustang GT PP
I may be wrong, but the higher the number the more lean it is. The optimal/regular WOT AFR is usually 14.2 for my car, so wouldn't 11's be more rich?

It's always been my understanding that you want anywhere from 11-14 WOT for AFR. Unless you are running E85 where the guys have 8-9 AFRs
14.2 afr is very lean. Too lean. Normally for NA you don't want to be much leaner than 12.5 or so.

11's is normally where most boosted cars are tuned to.
Sponsored

 
 




Top