Sponsored

Want a little more HP without breaking the bank.

Whitedevil95

Well-Known Member
Joined
Apr 25, 2019
Threads
37
Messages
742
Reaction score
507
Location
Temecula, CA
First Name
J.P.
Vehicle(s)
2017 Mustang GT
I am pretty sure the reason Lund doesnt tune the Roush kits is because they are MAP based and do not have a MAF on the 2018+ kits.
Sponsored

 

brucelinc

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jan 25, 2018
Threads
14
Messages
3,105
Reaction score
2,142
Location
MN
First Name
Bruce
Vehicle(s)
2018 Mustang GT premium A10 (SOLD)
Yep, looks like it commands about 17 deg spark at wot, assuming ect and mct are normal. It will advance it up to 3 deg and wind up at 20 if octane is available.
Question for you, Mike: Let's say the Roush cal pulls 3 degrees of timing when IAT2 reaches 150 degrees. If the car has sufficient octane to achieve the 20 degrees when temps are lower, would it still pull the same 3 degrees.....giving the 17? If so, it seems that higher octane would be helpful in high temp areas.

(I have no idea if the cal pulls timing at certain iat2 levels or how much. My question is just theoretical.)
 

engineermike

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jul 15, 2018
Threads
16
Messages
4,205
Reaction score
3,577
Location
La
Vehicle(s)
2018 GTPP A10
Question for you, Mike: Let's say the Roush cal pulls 3 degrees of timing when IAT2 reaches 150 degrees. If the car has sufficient octane to achieve the 20 degrees when temps are lower, would it still pull the same 3 degrees.....giving the 17? If so, it seems that higher octane would be helpful in high temp areas.
Looks like at 151 deg charge temp it actually “pulls” a whopping 9 deg of timing at 5000+ rpm. Understand that this is a borderline spark “correction”. As such, it is applied to the 17 deg I posted earlier, so the initial timing command is 8 degrees. The 3 deg knock advance maximum is applied to that number, so it could go up to 11.

The intent of the charge temp timing “pull” is to match the actual increase in knock potential. So, if everything is calibrated right, then the knock threshold drops the same as the timing command reduction.

The roush phase 2 pulls twice as much timing as stock and predator over the same span, which tells me roush is fudging on the side of safety and REALLY wants to prevent knock at high charge temps.
 

Cory S

Well-Known Member
Joined
Dec 10, 2019
Threads
47
Messages
3,355
Reaction score
3,702
Location
Bradford, NH
First Name
Cory
Vehicle(s)
2016 Mustang GT Premium
Question for you, Mike: Let's say the Roush cal pulls 3 degrees of timing when IAT2 reaches 150 degrees. If the car has sufficient octane to achieve the 20 degrees when temps are lower, would it still pull the same 3 degrees.....giving the 17? If so, it seems that higher octane would be helpful in high temp areas.

(I have no idea if the cal pulls timing at certain iat2 levels or how much. My question is just theoretical.)
IAT and knock are two different tables. So yes, even if spark is commanded to be pulled at 150° IAT, it’s going to be pulled even if zero knock is present.
 
OP
OP
Old5.Oguy

Old5.Oguy

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jun 30, 2019
Threads
34
Messages
154
Reaction score
60
Location
New York
First Name
John
Vehicle(s)
2018 Mustang GT Auto
With headers and a VMP tune I ran a 10.4@133 on a 19" et street ss... I added a KC and my IAT2's are respectable now.... It'll be interesting to see what I run next. I want to add a BAP too.... I think I'm in need of fuel at the top end of my runs....
I’ve been back and forth with the tune, either VMP or PBD.
Sponsored

 
 




Top