- Joined
- Dec 20, 2014
- Threads
- 171
- Messages
- 1,399
- Reaction score
- 636
- Location
- Lake Worth, FL
- Website
- www.uprproducts.com
- Vehicle(s)
- 15 GT
Sponsored
UPR Dual Valve Catch Can (DVCC), hands down.Thread revival. So which oil catch can is more effective and easiest to use for the daily driver who wants to protect his engine?
The UPR has a larger capacity so you don't have to drain as often, it is easier to drain when you add a 1/4" NPT mini ball valve. The biggest plus to UPR is if you get the DVCC style which will do its job at filtering even when boosting since it has a second vacuum source. UPR also has 2 check valves (I forget if mishi has any or not). The new UPR can comes with a silicon coupler that has a tee for the hose that routes to the intake of the turbo which requires no drilling or modifying the stock intake pipe.How much better is the UPR vs Mishimoto?
The UPR with the upgraded valve will cost me $350 odd US, vs $150 us on the Mishimoto.
I will be running MAP Street FMIC, Cobb AP w/ e tune (though not too aggressive), NGK 6510s..
I guess aside from the complaint about the extra $$$, the fact that I have to drill into the OEM piping and pop those hoses means that the car is just that bit harder to stock for the dealer. So ultimately are we talking night and day difference? The WOT line is the biggest distinction though I am not full bottle as to the significance of the difference? Does it mean it catches more or is better at dealing with the pressure of a WOT pull?
Thanks in advance.
I'd you order one now, it'll come with the silicon coupler. Drilling into the intake was the old Gen 1 style and hasn't been used for some time.Thanks Bam, I saw a few different manuals and different install videos and one did have that piece however wasn't clear what it came with from either of the websites I am looking to order from. Looking at the UPR website the linked instructions show having to drill into the turbo tube... I guess I'll have to clarify with them prior to purchase.