Sponsored

Octane for '15 5.0

RevvdMedia

Well-Known Member
Joined
Aug 29, 2013
Threads
60
Messages
718
Reaction score
160
Location
Canada
Vehicle(s)
2015 Mustang GT Premium
Amongst reading Ford's literature for the new 5.0, I got thinking about what octane I will plan to run when I get my 5.0. For summertime, of course I want ALL the power, which Ford rated the 5.0 on 93 octane. Ideally, in the summer, I would run what is available to me, only two brands (Husky and Petro Canada), which are 94 octane with up to 10% ethanol...somewhat not ideal. Inversely, I can get 91 octane with no ethanol from Shell (V-power), but I lose a nominal amount of power...theoretically. My location is 2000ft above sea level, and I wonder at that altitude if I really would need 91 octane, or if our slightly thinner air would allow for use of 91 octane with no knock retard.

Then comes winter, when I know there is absolutely no reason to ever press the throttle to the floor in a 400lb/ft RWD sports car, it will NEVER hook up. That being said, I wonder about running 87 octane for the subzero months. I don't like the idea of using crap gas in a great engine like the 5.0, but if it really doesn't NEED it, then should I even bother with premium? My past experience with knocky engines is my old Grand Prix GTP, which would see 4 degrees of knock retard at higher throttle even using 91 octane. I wonder under 1/2 to 3/4 throttle if the 5.0 would have any using 87?

I don't want to sound cheap, but the fact 91 octane costs about 75 cents a gallon more than 87...it will add up, especially remote starting the car in winter, idling, cold engine, etc.

Thoughts?
Sponsored

 

Todd15Fastback

Well-Known Member
Joined
Dec 10, 2013
Threads
80
Messages
10,523
Reaction score
3,883
Location
Atlanta, GA
First Name
Todd
Vehicle(s)
2015 Mustang GT PP Fastback
I will be running 91/93 octane all year round...same as I have done with all my other Mustangs since 1992.
 

5.0GT

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jun 25, 2013
Threads
7
Messages
894
Reaction score
22
Location
Texas
Run 91/93 for the best performance. This car was meant to run on it.
 

Sponsored

EXP Jawa

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jun 9, 2014
Threads
3
Messages
1,011
Reaction score
206
Location
Rochester, NY
Website
www.torsen.com
First Name
Rick
Vehicle(s)
1999 Cobra Convertible, Electric Green
I would think that 94 octane, mixed with 10% ethanol, is probably compromised in terms of specific output by the ethanol (since the car won't be able to make use of ethanol's higher octane effect), is probably on par with what you'd get from 91 octane with no ethanol blended in. What you loose due to a couple of octane points is probably equal to what you loose from the ethanol blend.

Honestly, in all practical terms, it isn't going to be a noticeable difference in 99% of situations. For me, just driving to work and the store, etc, I can't see the 1% loss in power by running 87 to be worth the extra $6 per fill up. Sure, if I went to an auto-X or an open track event, different story. But around town, a loss of 4HP isn't going to be a big deal. The car will run just fine (no harm done) on 87, so why pay more when it isn't needed?
 

xlover

King of Laserball
Joined
Oct 1, 2013
Threads
10
Messages
632
Reaction score
12
Location
Boston
Vehicle(s)
2022 BMW M
ill run 93 spring summer fall, and probably winter as well as i will forget to think about putting 89 or 87 in... my current car is 93 year round so im used to it
 

jeebuspwnz

Well-Known Member
Joined
Apr 27, 2014
Threads
3
Messages
187
Reaction score
3
Location
SD
Vehicle(s)
m3
I would never put 87 octane in a performance engine with high compression that makes more power on higher octane, because all I'd be doing is robbing power and decreasing fuel economy.

Unfortunately though, I'll be running 91 because that's all I can get.
 

stilesg57

Well-Known Member
Joined
Aug 8, 2014
Threads
1
Messages
188
Reaction score
0
Run the best octane you can in a performance motor. Not doing so is a total false economy.

How many miles a year do you drive? Divide that by 20 to get your gallons burned. Multiply that by 0.75 to get your add'l dollars spent to consistently run premium fuel. What's the number? If it's under ~$500 it's worth it. Remember that changing octane requires the ECU to learn the change...by running into knock and then backing out timing. If you're going to keep the car very long, it's worth it to run the best octane you can get consistently. Much easier on your very-expensive-to-replace motor.
 

Sponsored

Arabian Mustang

Active Member
Joined
Sep 19, 2014
Threads
3
Messages
29
Reaction score
0
In here we can get 89oct, 93oct and 95oct,and of course 98oct so the option for me is 98oct LOL
 

HalfMoon

Brand Agnostic
Joined
Jun 1, 2014
Threads
1
Messages
812
Reaction score
136
Location
West Coast
Vehicle(s)
2016 Corvette Z06/Z07 2017 Camaro SS 1LE

w3rkn

Well-Known Member
Joined
Dec 18, 2013
Threads
21
Messages
3,064
Reaction score
750
Location
Detroit
Vehicle(s)
bmw 135is(sold)
Amongst reading Ford's literature for the new 5.0, I got thinking about what octane I will plan to run when I get my 5.0. For summertime, of course I want ALL the power, which Ford rated the 5.0 on 93 octane. Ideally, in the summer, I would run what is available to me, only two brands (Husky and Petro Canada), which are 94 octane with up to 10% ethanol...somewhat not ideal. Inversely, I can get 91 octane with no ethanol from Shell (V-power), but I lose a nominal amount of power...theoretically. My location is 2000ft above sea level, and I wonder at that altitude if I really would need 91 octane, or if our slightly thinner air would allow for use of 91 octane with no knock retard.

Then comes winter, when I know there is absolutely no reason to ever press the throttle to the floor in a 400lb/ft RWD sports car, it will NEVER hook up. That being said, I wonder about running 87 octane for the subzero months. I don't like the idea of using crap gas in a great engine like the 5.0, but if it really doesn't NEED it, then should I even bother with premium? My past experience with knocky engines is my old Grand Prix GTP, which would see 4 degrees of knock retard at higher throttle even using 91 octane. I wonder under 1/2 to 3/4 throttle if the 5.0 would have any using 87?

I don't want to sound cheap, but the fact 91 octane costs about 75 cents a gallon more than 87...it will add up, especially remote starting the car in winter, idling, cold engine, etc.

Thoughts?
Why starve your baby.. relish in the fact you have a monster & feed it..!
 

Arabian Mustang

Active Member
Joined
Sep 19, 2014
Threads
3
Messages
29
Reaction score
0
I think you use the RON method to calculate the octane over there. In that case your 98 is the same as our 93. See below:

USA (AKI/PON) - Europe/Others (RON)

87 = 91
89 = 93
91 = 95
93 = 98

Those numbers are rounded down, but here's a page with the formulas: http://www.pencilgeek.org/2009/05/octane-rating-conversions.html
That's true , even when I order custom tunes and different things from the states , It's always noted as 93oct , the only small difference is here they actually refine the fuel more than once before selling it
 

Brent302

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 13, 2014
Threads
18
Messages
3,528
Reaction score
400
Location
Springfield VA
Vehicle(s)
2015 Mustang GT/PP
That's true , even when I order custom tunes and different things from the states , It's always noted as 93oct , the only small difference is here they actually refine the fuel more than once before selling it
How's the gas prices there in Dubai? I've heard it's crazy cheap.
Sponsored

 
 








Top