Mustang_Lou
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- May 1, 2016
- Threads
- 13
- Messages
- 1,820
- Reaction score
- 777
- Location
- Toronto, Canada
- Vehicle(s)
- 2020 Mustang Bullitt
That's interesting as here in Canada we also measure it in L/100 km. I set mine down to .9xxx but haven't driven it enough with this never-ending winter to know if I'm going the correct way or not.I'll have my fuel economy displayed in l/100km (not in mpg). So for me if my real calculated economy is lower than what the car will display I'll have the bias number other way round (Real: 20l/100km; Car: 18l/100km). So my calculated bias would be 0,9. But if I did calculations in mpg it would be 1,111. That is because I calculate fuel per distance and (in US) you calculate distance per fuel. What number should I use in setting the correction value. Can someone who uses l/100km measure tell me?
I think I am as the car's # was higher than actual calculated so I think the car's formula is just applying a .9xx factor to what IT calculates to bring it to a more realistic figure.
Sponsored