Pablo GT350
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Dec 17, 2013
- Threads
- 0
- Messages
- 350
- Reaction score
- 31
- Location
- Great Southwest
- Vehicle(s)
- Cayman S
Sponsored

Wow! Come to Daddy!
It just looks better by a mile. I mean, if it's not good for Europe then let Europe keep the current config, but give the GT this front end/hood because it looks MILES better. The current hood inside just makes a very weird view. They got it right with the 350.With the hood and front end being lower can ford transfer this configuration to a global car? If it doesn't meet euro crash standards don't expect to see it on a non GT350.
I'm not sure if keeping the GT350 to the American market allowed for the departure or they just went in that direction out of chance. Either way it does look much better.
I'm sure Ford executives peep this blog for feedback...If we keep complaining long enough, perhaps we can get a refresh for 2016...or if I have to spend more coin for a GT350, hopefully they will offer it with an Auto Trans!It just looks better by a mile. I mean, if it's not good for Europe then let Europe keep the current config, but give the GT this front end/hood because it looks MILES better. The current hood inside just makes a very weird view. They got it right with the 350.
I doubt you'll see an AT in the 350. There was talk but I doubt it. I think more likely you'll have to go aftermarket and replace hood/sides/fascia.I'm sure Ford executives peep this blog for feedback...If we keep complaining long enough, perhaps we can get a refresh for 2016...or if I have to spend more coin for a GT350, hopefully they will offer it with an Auto Trans!
A pure refresh would prob be '18 year where you get the 10 speed tranny and a body update.2016 is a bit early for a refresh, I would expect 2017 at the earliest, likely 2018
So I was looking at a few more pictures of the GT vs the GT350. I'm not seeing the headlights being 1" lower. They line up with the wheel well rim, etc in the majority of shot's I've seen that seem comparable.Don't forget, the entire front end of the GT350 -- headlights and all -- is 1" lower than lesser, non-Ford Performance-branded Mustangs. I agree, though, that it makes for a much better-, meaner-looking car.
I'm going by what Jamal said in his interview with SVT Performance. Also, per Car and Driver:So I was looking at a few more pictures of the GT vs the GT350. I'm not seeing the headlights being 1" lower. They line up with the wheel well rim, etc in the majority of shot's I've seen that seem comparable.
Can you show me some shots that bar none show the lights lower?