sk47
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Nov 12, 2020
- Threads
- 32
- Messages
- 6,813
- Reaction score
- 3,161
- Location
- North Eastern TN
- First Name
- Jeff
- Vehicle(s)
- Chevy Silverado & Nissan Sentra SE
Hello; We see thru this ploy. You get to use information from other to bolster the arguments you make without you personally doing any studies of your own. But we who have differing information are to conduct our own studies. You even throw in the "peer review" term again so often used during Covid.Scientists have made it abundantly clear that IF they’re correct, the cost of going green is nothing compared to the cost of doing nothing.
You’re free to argue their findings of course, but you’ll need to conduct your own studies and show that their math is wrong. Peer-review will soon show if you’ve got the numbers right or not.
New shoe dropped recently concerning Covid. Seems there is confirmation Covid did come from a lab in China. Not exactly news for most of us. I do recall you and a couple others using "peer reviewed" studies against some of us for a couple of years. Seems that ploy has become a part of why so few have confidence in the declarations of the "scientists" who traded in their credibility in order to support an agenda which paid the bills.
That you are still clinging to the "false science" of the covid pandemic era is sad. I was a low-level scientist as Biology/science teacher to be sure. I am saddened that my chosen path in life was so badly tarnished during Covid. I stood for what I understood to be correct on this forum and had to take my lumps from the likes of you over and over. You still gloat about my being kicked out of that one thread.
Science itself is not corrupt, only those who chose an agenda and compromised their own ethics. Some chose the correct path.
Sponsored

