tripleyellowmustang
Well-Known Member
Yep, the UK has big, big plans.Emboldened to identify what I am responding too.
An exclamation mark at the end of an exclamation is entirely appropriate
As has been explained to you, solar panels are safe, reliable and sustainable. You said they are not - I have demonstrated clearly they are from experience. If you are unwilling to accept this then the problem is yours. Many millions of people worldwide use solar panels in a safe, reliable and sustainable way.
The US grid does seem to be in a poor state, the UK is less so, but planned developments to cover local demand are planned. What more do you want?
EVs and electricity | ESO (nationalgrideso.com)
National Grid - Electric vehicles

https://www.theguardian.com/busines...jects-in-limbo-as-grid-struggles-to-keep-pace
āWindfarms, solar arrays, and battery projects are stuck in gridlock for up to 15 years as the UKās electricity grid struggles to keep pace with the appetite for more clean energy ā including a car factory being forced to wait until 2037.
The delays threaten to undermine decades of work to attract the investment needed to support the UKās clean energy ambitions, and risks derailing Britainās progress towards legally binding climate targets.ā
āāThe grid just isnāt ready for it. You could argue that itās negligence,ā he says. ā[The government has] been speaking about climate action for over a decade now, so you would have to assume that they knew what would be required.āā
āThe UK has the longest queue to connect to the electricity grid of any country in Europe. There are about 200 gigawatts worth of electricity projects waiting for a grid connection, according to research by Bloomberg New Energy Finance, or enough to power 150m UK homes. Many are speculative applications from projects that are unlikely to move ahead. But the āfirst come first servedā rules of grid connection mean many viable projects that could move ahead at speed are stuck.ā
Sponsored
Last edited:
(sarcasm)