victory-rc
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Dec 24, 2017
- Threads
- 18
- Messages
- 229
- Reaction score
- 366
- Location
- From Glen Ridge,Nj now Colchester,ct
- Vehicle(s)
- 21' , premium ,10 speed, Mustang GT
- Vehicle Showcase
- 2
Sponsored
Don't think we will need to worry too much about rationing, the higher prices have cut back a bit on demand.The US alone looks to be at about a 1 million bpd deficit. It’s just a matter of time now. Next the talk is going to shift to shortages of diesel especially in Europe but will trickle to the rest of the world.
$6.00+ summertime National average seems pretty likely. Diesel should be $8.00+ but rationing could make that number $10+
Ironically, if the ethanol subsidies were stopped - even temporarily - the cost of gas would go down....more than most people think.Also e85 and other ethanol fuels cost less, why? Politics, government subsidies on ethanol production.
Hello; Yes to this. The corn ethanol program has been around long enough for the details to be known. I do not recall the exact figures any more but will make up an example. The idea was to supplement the total fuel supply. What i have read in the past decades is to get ten gallons of ethanol by distillation of corn than close to eight or nine gallons of petroleum fuel is used, mostly diesel.Ironically, if the ethanol subsidies were stopped - even temporarily - the cost of gas would go down....more than most people think.
Well it was fun while it lasted. Back up $0.05.Paid $50 for 10.6 gallons of premium last night. ($4.84)
On the other hand, I'm grateful that my work vehicle is company provided.
That's true, but that's not even the entire story. ENVIRONMENTALISTS recently released a long term study on U.S. Ethanol production. BECAUSE it became profitable (govt subsidies) to plant corn for ethanol production with farmers, these farmers CLEARED more land to plant said corn. Their DATA showed them that the U.S. Ethanol program has actually caused MORE carbon emissions in the climate because of the elimination of woodlands (natural carbon sinks).Hello; Yes to this. The corn ethanol program has been around long enough for the details to be known. I do not recall the exact figures any more but will make up an example. The idea was to supplement the total fuel supply. What i have read in the past decades is to get ten gallons of ethanol by distillation of corn than close to eight or nine gallons of petroleum fuel is used, mostly diesel.
Ethanol is higher octane to be sure but has less energy density than gasoline. A gallon of ethanol less energy than a gallon of gasoline is my understanding. You can run a higher compression due to the octane rating so get more power, but it takes more gallons is my understanding.
Hmmmmm.That's true, but that's not even the entire story. ENVIRONMENTALISTS recently released a long term study on U.S. Ethanol production. BECAUSE it became profitable (govt subsidies) to plant corn for ethanol production with farmers, these farmers CLEARED more land to plant said corn. Their DATA showed them that the U.S. Ethanol program has actually caused MORE carbon emissions in the climate because of the elimination of woodlands (natural carbon sinks).
Ironic huh?
Other, arguably more important (at least in the next 20-30 years) is the fact that more farmers growing more corn for ethanol mean less farmers growing corn or other grains for livestock feed, human consumption, export etc.
Look at the commodities market right now. Look at the price of corn and wheat - just two examples. Then check the price of potash and other fertilizer ingredients. The increase in food prices is here. It hasn't hit full force yet - remember these are FUTURE prices - but the price increase of the things needed to plant grains (fuel, fertilizer etc etc) has already resulted in a net DECREASE in grain planting per acre in the U.S. - which means less production later this year.
The increase in fuel prices increases the cost of almost EVERY consumer good we know take for granted.
I won't even dip my toe into the ridiculously deep waters of supply chain shortages that are getting worse, not better....
Hello; I am guessing you have a point in posting the links. The first states corn ethanol for fuel does not get subsidies. I do not recall anyone stating that they do. The use of a food crop, corn, as a fuel has issues as has been mentioned. Subsidies not being among them.
Nothing really, I just thought they were interesting. Just added because of the talk about ethanol.Hello; I am guessing you have a point in posting the links. The first states corn ethanol for fuel does not get subsidies. I do not recall anyone stating that they do. The use of a food crop, corn, as a fuel has issues as has been mentioned. Subsidies not being among them.
second link about corn production for food is part of the government subsidies for agriculture is true although I do not know the details. Whether or not the government should subsidize food production is a worthy topic. A topic far from the discussion on fuel prices.
That you attached the links to a post by ctandc72 is a puzzle. What is your point?

The Ethanol link is a dodge...