Sponsored

Direct Injection 3.7?

davejonnes

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 17, 2015
Threads
22
Messages
205
Reaction score
40
Location
United States
Vehicle(s)
2017 Mustang GT350

lzaffuto

Well-Known Member
Joined
Apr 6, 2016
Threads
4
Messages
89
Reaction score
12
Location
Atlanta GA
First Name
Lucas
Vehicle(s)
2015 V6 Vert
And this says nothing about carbon buildup, which is the main thing that worries me about direct injection. It looks like they are starting to figure out a solution with the dual injection systems, but we need to see what the insides of those engines look like at 30k, 60k, etc to make sure it works like it is supposed to.
 

jasonstang

Well-Known Member
Joined
Oct 23, 2015
Threads
23
Messages
5,571
Reaction score
1,307
Location
Denver, CO
Vehicle(s)
2017 GB GT/CS 6MT
I think it's because the fuel saving is not worth the extra cost.
Can you imagine having a high compression V6 or V8?
 

DANA44

Well-Known Member
Joined
Dec 27, 2015
Threads
17
Messages
347
Reaction score
116
Location
Central Connecticut
First Name
Dave
Vehicle(s)
2016 v6 convertible
I like to having the intake valves cleaned by the detergent that I paid for in the fill up. One of the reasons with going for the V6. I have owned DI cars. Sometimes simple things are better.
 

fordguys550

yep..."just" a V6
Joined
Oct 11, 2015
Threads
25
Messages
2,111
Reaction score
454
Location
tehachapi, ca
Vehicle(s)
2016 v6 6spd
actually our motors are a fairly high 10.5:1 compression ratio..back in the 90s that was about unheard of on a production car. everything was 9.5 or under. the fact we can run 10.5:1 on 87 oct is pretty awesome, especially considering how much power we can get from a little 227 cu in motor....I mean, consider that will you! :) 227 cubes....making more power than any hot dog 289 did back in the day, with 2x the fuel economy.....and less weight. yes....I love technology :p still, something to be said for the simplicity of old carb'd motors
 

Sponsored

lzaffuto

Well-Known Member
Joined
Apr 6, 2016
Threads
4
Messages
89
Reaction score
12
Location
Atlanta GA
First Name
Lucas
Vehicle(s)
2015 V6 Vert
Carbs and simplicity is an oxymoron. Everyone knows carbs are built upon a combination of voodoo magic and unobtainium. :p

Seriously though, I'd take OBD0 or OBD1 level fuel injection over carbs for simplicity any day of the week. I agree we're getting back to being too complicated now though.
 

DR_

Well-Known Member
Joined
Apr 7, 2015
Threads
11
Messages
669
Reaction score
261
Location
In a van down by the river
First Name
David
Vehicle(s)
like a complete jerk
For my new truck I steered clear of the DI as I just don't trust it long term. Now the newly redesigned 2017 3.5 Ecoboost with the dual injections should be better.
 

USMC V6

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jul 26, 2015
Threads
25
Messages
397
Reaction score
48
Location
Sunny Isles Beach, FL
Vehicle(s)
2015 Mustang V6 Premium 51A, GT 18"wheels, spoiler
Look at the 3.5 V6 twin turbo in the 2016 Ford GT, racing in ISMA 630 HP / 530 TQ.
 

BmacIL

Enginerd
Joined
Sep 21, 2014
Threads
69
Messages
14,989
Reaction score
8,907
Location
Naperville, IL
Vehicle(s)
2015 Guard GT Base, M/T
Vehicle Showcase
1
Dual fuel injection (PFI and DI) is the future. The only thing that gets worse is engine complexity. All other attributes are improved (fuel economy, power, response), with the exception of high pressure pump noise if not compensated for well.
 
OP
OP

davejonnes

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 17, 2015
Threads
22
Messages
205
Reaction score
40
Location
United States
Vehicle(s)
2017 Mustang GT350
Yeah, I see the idea here. DI or PFI will end up having an upper hand in terms of performance/economy. But at the time Ford was developing the 3.7, the cost was not worth it to them I'm guessing... or the technology was still fairly "new", not as matured.
Sponsored

 
 








Top