MAPerformance
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jan 14, 2015
- Threads
- 137
- Messages
- 1,681
- Reaction score
- 999
- Location
- Cottage Grove, MN
- Website
- www.maperformance.com
- First Name
- Sales
- Vehicle(s)
- 2015 Ecoboost Base w/ Performance Package
Just one.
Sponsored
^^This^^ if you just blindly gap to a smaller gap, like 0.026, you could be losing out on some performance. In the past, before exotic metal plugs, like iridium, you had to gap smaller because the plug electrodes would wear faster, and you had to account for that. With iridium plugs and center electrodes of 0.5mm or larger, you don't really have to worry about wear for probably at least 50k miles. So, start out higher, make sure you test it under full boost, looking for any signs of misfire, and stop when the engine is running best. Maybe tighten the gap another 0.001 for a little cushion, but that's up to you.I also have mine at 0.028.
You want to use the widest gap that you can to ensure a more complete and powerful combustion process, but you don't want that gap to be so wide that the spark gets blown out and you have misfires. I usually start on the higher end of the recommendations and work my way down, 0.001 at a time, to reach where the engine seems to operate the best.
Almost every EBM I've tuned has consistent results at .026-.028 only one car did I have to have them pull the plus back out and try .030 to get the results I was looking for. It's best to fine tune plug gaps with dataloging capability, that's how I got to my recommendation in my spark plug post.^^This^^ if you just blindly gap to a smaller gap, like 0.026, you could be losing out on some performance. In the past, before exotic metal plugs, like iridium, you had to gap smaller because the plug electrodes would wear faster, and you had to account for that. With iridium plugs and center electrodes of 0.5mm or larger, you don't really have to worry about wear for probably at least 50k miles. So, start out higher, make sure you test it under full boost, looking for any signs of misfire, and stop when the engine is running best. Maybe tighten the gap I another 0.001 for a little cushion, but that's up to you.
Not questioning your recommendation. I've been very impressed with the level of information that MAPerformance posts on this forum, especially because you back it up with solid testing. And I doubt if anyone, except someone to whom a tenth of a second in a 1/4 mile is important, could tell the difference between plugs gapped at .026 and .028. So, unless you're anal, like me, pull the plugs, gap them all to a consistent .026, put 'em back in and drive happy. I'm just the kind of guy that wants to get as much as I can for free, except of course for the time I spend, so I'll continue to try to get a gap as large as I can. I just wish I had your testing equipment.Almost every EBM I've tuned has consistent results at .026-.028 only one car did I have to have them pull the plus back out and try .030 to get the results I was looking for. It's best to fine tune plug gaps with dataloging capability, that's how I got to my recommendation in my spark plug post.