Dirty-EB-Chicago
V.I.P Member
You sure those arnt the dying gasps of your engine model as it ceases to exist in the lineup? :shrug:whats that you say I cant hear you a EB lawn mower just went by LOL
Sponsored
You sure those arnt the dying gasps of your engine model as it ceases to exist in the lineup? :shrug:whats that you say I cant hear you a EB lawn mower just went by LOL
Not what I was referring to. That's not a realistic example to go in the Mustang. Of course the GT sounds good. The exhaust system on that car is probably $5k or more. Plus the GT is ridiculously expensive.Mmmm idk about similar. I'm pretty sure the new Ford GT sounds noticably better than our EB stangs. ;)
For the love of god this is what is driving me away from the mustang. I want a sunroof so badly, I'm looking at challengers right now actually.Think about what they had in 1988;
2.3L SOHC I-4 Inter-cooled turbo motor, 190HP.
5SPD MT.
Adjustable shocks.
4-wheel ABS/disc brakes.
LSD.
A bad-ass cassette stereo with an EQUALIZER
Sun roof.
C&D's Car Of The Year in 1988. The car that was tested by C&D is in Livonia Michigan, at Roush's facility, on display.
I did not care about how it sounded... I was more concerned with other things.Serious question here, anyone bought the ecoboost because they liked the sound of an inline 4/turbo noises? I know many of us love the V8 rumble but I was checking to see if this was the same for the ecoboost guys.
OMFG that statement make perfect sense about why you picked a real, working animal for the ecoboost and a fairy horse that doesn't exist and craps rainbows for the 5.0 :lol::lol::lol:If Ford put the 3.5 EB I'd like it. My avatar would be reversed if they did so. As it stands, it's pretty accurate.