whatsup62
Well-Known Member
Great post...and with the exception of me being a manual...exactly the same. I never had a issue with the bama tune, When I had it I put down 405/373 on 93 race tune. I had LT's and Airaid at the time. Car always ran very well. No complaints with customer service either. Being the type of person always wanting more I switched to Lund and got the Ngauge. I also switched to the JLT CAI. Car ran good. Butt dyno said there was more but never made it back to a real dyno. Now on the FF tune and ...oh buddy!! Car has never ran so strong. I sent some logs in and Lund said it was spot on, no revisions.
I only have two pros and cons to add to yours. I definitely prefer the Ngauge over the SCT X4. Secondly I had the 170 stat installed with the Bama tune. The car ran on average 5-8 degrees cooler with the Bama tune. My head temps never saw above 189 on the Bama tune Lund I am seeing highs in the 196 max range. Not a big difference, but a difference none the less. Any noobs out there I dont think you can go wrong either way.
Boost coming in two weeks!!!!
I only have two pros and cons to add to yours. I definitely prefer the Ngauge over the SCT X4. Secondly I had the 170 stat installed with the Bama tune. The car ran on average 5-8 degrees cooler with the Bama tune. My head temps never saw above 189 on the Bama tune Lund I am seeing highs in the 196 max range. Not a big difference, but a difference none the less. Any noobs out there I dont think you can go wrong either way.
Boost coming in two weeks!!!!
Sponsored
