Sponsored

Automobile Mag ride along

Topnotch

Well-Known Member
Joined
Aug 1, 2012
Threads
592
Messages
4,565
Reaction score
3,783
Location
NYC
Vehicle(s)
2018 Mazda CX-9 Touring
http://www.automobilemag.com/reviews/driven/1405-2015-ford-mustang-2-3-ecoboost-first-ride/

CHARLOTTE, North Carolina — Let’s not make too much of this. We spent about five minutes riding in the 2015 Ford Mustang 2.3 EcoBoost during a recent Ford Racing event at Lowe’s Motor Speedway in Charlotte, North Carolina. This is about the same amount of time that you spend on a roller coaster ride.

So it’s no surprise that we learned about as much as you would on an amusement park roller coaster. Even so, the ride made us pretty happy. In fact, the small gaggle of Mustang engineers swirling around the two cars in which we rode was awfully happy, too. They were practically jumping into the air every few seconds, just like ten year olds.

In all the childlike excitement, the Ford people told us a few things about the 2.3 EcoBoost version that make us look forward to the official introduction of the 2015 Ford Mustang in September 2014 with even more eagerness.

The 2015 Ford Mustang 2.3 EcoBoost is not a dog
First, let us assure you that the new Mustang 2.3 EcoBoost is nothing like the 1986 Ford Mustang 2.3 SVO, a car that we drove when it was new. We still remember the look of disappointment on the face of SVO president Michael Kranefuss as we gave him our initial impressions of the Fox-platform Mustang with its turbocharged, 200-hp Pinto engine.

The 2.3-liter EcoBoost four-cylinder with a twin-scroll turbocharger, direct fuel injection, and variable valve timing is expected to make 305 hp and 300 lb-ft of torque. This is an impressive amount of power that should help justify Ford’s decision to identify the engine as a premium application in the 2015 Mustang, slotted between the standard 3.7-liter V-6 and 5.0-liter V-8. (We expect the premium to be somewhere between the $995 option price for the 2.0-liter EcoBoost four in the Taurus and the $2395 price of the EcoBoost V-6 in the F-150.) The Mustang’s 2.3 sure sounds like a premium engine, winding up with a sonorous warble as the boost gauge in the instrument binnacle tickles 18 psi during full-throttle acceleration before settling at 15 psi under normal operation.

Other applications of turbocharged four-cylinder engines in premium cars are often meant to deliver mpg rather than mph, even high-output ones that we’ve seen in the Cadillac CTS and Jaguar XF. And while mpg is certainly part of the program for the Mustang EcoBoost, this turbo four feels lively, and it reduces the amount of weight sitting on the front tires, which is a fine thing to cut.

Flip the switches for speed
The Mustang 2.3-liter EcoBoost will come with either a six-speed automatic transmission or a six-speed manual, and our ride had the automatic, just as you’d expect in a pre-production car. The 2015 Ford Mustang will come with electronic chassis calibration featuring four modes: normal, sport, track and snow/wet. The Mustang’s automatic also has shift paddles on the steering wheel, and when you select sport mode, a throttle blip helps quicken the gear engagement for every downshift.

Naturally, the four chassis modes determine throttle response, shift points, and stability-control calibration. In addition, the electric-assist rack-and-pinion steering also has different modes: comfort, normal, and sport. We did our little loops around a short autocross circuit behind some infield grandstands at Lowe’s Motor Speedway, and the engineer at the wheel did his best to show us the quickness with which the transmission can react in sport mode and the unobtrusive permissiveness of the stability control.
Sponsored

 

navair133

Well-Known Member
Joined
Mar 26, 2014
Threads
6
Messages
213
Reaction score
67
Location
So Cal
First Name
Fred
Vehicle(s)
2015 Black Mustang Eco/PP; 2003 Porsche Boxster
Thanks Topnotch. DIB 2.3L Eco-Boost PP to be ordered.
 

Michael

Member
Joined
Jan 1, 2014
Threads
1
Messages
22
Reaction score
0
Location
Ventura County, CA
Vehicle(s)
2000 Corvette
My guess is you would never get your money back in gas savings to pay for the Ecoboost option. And you still have a 4 cylinder.

Michael
 

WestRace

Well-Known Member
Joined
Sep 8, 2013
Threads
11
Messages
295
Reaction score
4
Location
SoCal
Vehicle(s)
E46 M3
My guess is you would never get your money back in gas savings to pay for the Ecoboost option. And you still have a 4 cylinder.

Michael
You can potentially get more power out of the 4 with a few simple mods.
 

Sponsored

Spartan

Well-Known Member
Joined
Apr 29, 2014
Threads
94
Messages
3,883
Reaction score
569
Location
MD
Vehicle(s)
Ford Explorer Sport
My guess is you would never get your money back in gas savings to pay for the Ecoboost option. And you still have a 4 cylinder.

Michael
Exactly that...a guess. And do you really think Ford is going to put out a shitty EB engine in their 50th anniversary rebuild of the Mustang that is going global. Come on dude. We get it. You like many others hate that a 4 cylinder is going in the holy Mustang.
 

Shark77

Well-Known Member
Joined
Feb 28, 2014
Threads
2
Messages
155
Reaction score
29
Location
PNW
Vehicle(s)
MS3
Not worth it. All the money is down the drain at resale time. Might as well get the GT.

Michael
$ for $, the EB will lose less than the GT in resale given equal condition. If you look at used Mustangs, they all depreciate at the roughly same rate (sans SE ones). So, a lower priced Mustang will flush less money down the drain at resale.

Modern turbo 4s hold there value just fine. Look at WRXs, Evos, MS3s, etc... The key is how they were treated, and that's no different than any car (GT included).
 

RoryTate

Well-Known Member
Joined
Mar 10, 2014
Threads
1
Messages
121
Reaction score
3
Location
Rigaud, QC
Vehicle(s)
2015 EB
Don't forget that the EB takes 87 octane while the 5.0 takes 91. It makes a difference at the pump when you fill it, then again with whatever the fuel economy difference is between the two.
 

13GTCSMustang

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jun 25, 2013
Threads
1
Messages
111
Reaction score
3
Location
South Carolina
First Name
Steve
Vehicle(s)
2015 RR/GT/20's/NAV
Don't forget that the EB takes 87 octane while the 5.0 takes 91. It makes a difference at the pump when you fill it, then again with whatever the fuel economy difference is between the two.
You can run 87 in the 5.0 too. You just drop down about 10hp is all, so it's really a wash.
 

c3po

CNCforlife
Joined
Feb 28, 2014
Threads
1
Messages
285
Reaction score
6
Location
MN
First Name
Chris
Vehicle(s)
2014 Ford Fusion- company car
I wonder if all the 2004 and older Mustang GT owners would feel that way after seeing that muzzled and castrated Pitbull shit all over their cars on the drags trips and road courses.
 

Sponsored

rtk

Member
Joined
Dec 8, 2013
Threads
0
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
I wonder if all the 2004 and older Mustang GT owners would feel that way after seeing that muzzled and castrated Pitbull shit all over their cars on the drags trips and road courses.
Years ago (about 1999), I participated in a SVT Club event at Willow Springs (big track) in my Mustang SVO. Nobody knew what a SVO was (pity) and when they saw it was a "pathetic 4 cylinder" (somebody's words), they literally told me to my face, "Make sure you are out of my run group or get out of my way when I blow past you. I don't need a rolling chicane on the track."

When it came time to run, my "pathetic 4 cylinder" outran and out-lapped every Mustang Cobra on the track except one that equipped with a full Maximum Motorsport suspension. Altitude helped balance the SVO against the Cobra in terms of power, but the superior suspension, brakes, and balance got me through the turns much faster than the V8 counterparts. When I got into my friend's 1998 Cobra for a lap, I couldn't believe the amount of weight over the nose and push the car had through turns. At the end of that day, I had plenty coming over to look at the SVO to see why it was turning faster laps.

In 2003, I bought a Mach 1. Lots of fun with that car, but still a pig in turns. Some argue that it was never designed to be a road course car, but was really set up as a straight line drag car. Not sure if true or not about the Mach 1, but I can attest that its handling was inferior to my 1984 Mustang SVO.

Technology has come a long way and the 2015 Mustang promises quite a bit with its revised front suspension and IRS rear. I suspect the GT will be quite well balanced, but the Ecoboost will always be nimbler since most of the engine's weight will be behind the front wheel's centerline.

Mustang aficionados have always wanted V8 engines, so I will have to agree that the GT will be worth more in resale. (Or alternatively, look at the current price or lack of attention for Mustang SVOs.) Given the current lineup of Mustangs and a robust aftermarket for normally aspirated and forced induction engines however, I just don't see how a person can go wrong with either engine choice.
 

ZAGOR64

Active Member
Joined
Apr 11, 2014
Threads
0
Messages
30
Reaction score
0
Location
Italy
Vehicle(s)
POS company's car.
Years ago (about 1999), I participated in a SVT Club event at Willow Springs (big track) in my Mustang SVO. Nobody knew what a SVO was (pity) and when they saw it was a "pathetic 4 cylinder" (somebody's words), they literally told me to my face, "Make sure you are out of my run group or get out of my way when I blow past you. I don't need a rolling chicane on the track."

When it came time to run, my "pathetic 4 cylinder" outran and out-lapped every Mustang Cobra on the track except one that equipped with a full Maximum Motorsport suspension. Altitude helped balance the SVO against the Cobra in terms of power, but the superior suspension, brakes, and balance got me through the turns much faster than the V8 counterparts. When I got into my friend's 1998 Cobra for a lap, I couldn't believe the amount of weight over the nose and push the car had through turns. At the end of that day, I had plenty coming over to look at the SVO to see why it was turning faster laps.

In 2003, I bought a Mach 1. Lots of fun with that car, but still a pig in turns. Some argue that it was never designed to be a road course car, but was really set up as a straight line drag car. Not sure if true or not about the Mach 1, but I can attest that its handling was inferior to my 1984 Mustang SVO.

Technology has come a long way and the 2015 Mustang promises quite a bit with its revised front suspension and IRS rear. I suspect the GT will be quite well balanced, but the Ecoboost will always be nimbler since most of the engine's weight will be behind the front wheel's centerline.

Mustang aficionados have always wanted V8 engines, so I will have to agree that the GT will be worth more in resale. (Or alternatively, look at the current price or lack of attention for Mustang SVOs.) Given the current lineup of Mustangs and a robust aftermarket for normally aspirated and forced induction engines however, I just don't see how a person can go wrong with either engine choice.
This! Plus, if I may say so, here in Europe,drag racing is down to a minimum, since our roads are different than the ones you guys have there.(I used to live in L.A. for years,so I know what I'm talking about:D)Twisty side roads are the norm here, so a lighter/nimbler car can easily outrun any more powered but more heavy car.
Sponsored

 
 








Top