GuardGT
is currently pooping
- Thread starter
- #16
thanks for the compliments guys
and for the rest of you, take a second to actually read my original post. yes, this is a forum and you are more than welcome to your own opinions, but literally repeating exactly what I said in my original post...is redundant to say the least...keep up the good work :doh:
800+rwhp terminator, my dads boss(I store it), and under the cover is a 1200rwhp low 8 second sbf turbo 1967 gt coupe, all built by me. I have a little bit of an idea of what im doing. the tires are PERFECTLY safe stretched as they are, and it was for TEST FITMENT. this is my daily driver, and I don't need to put 315s on here pretending my car needs them with the measly 390rwhp. plus, 90% of drivers on here cant push their car past the capabilities of stock tires on the street anyway.
just trying to help out the mustang community that has been ever curious about what size/how wide they can run square, and what the outer limits of aggressive fitment looks like.
and for the rest of you, take a second to actually read my original post. yes, this is a forum and you are more than welcome to your own opinions, but literally repeating exactly what I said in my original post...is redundant to say the least...keep up the good work :doh: 800+rwhp terminator, my dads boss(I store it), and under the cover is a 1200rwhp low 8 second sbf turbo 1967 gt coupe, all built by me. I have a little bit of an idea of what im doing. the tires are PERFECTLY safe stretched as they are, and it was for TEST FITMENT. this is my daily driver, and I don't need to put 315s on here pretending my car needs them with the measly 390rwhp. plus, 90% of drivers on here cant push their car past the capabilities of stock tires on the street anyway.
just trying to help out the mustang community that has been ever curious about what size/how wide they can run square, and what the outer limits of aggressive fitment looks like.
Sponsored