OP
OP
KZStang
Guest
- Thread starter
- #31
I agree the Mustang needs a more central design language overall, but relying on too many unique design motifs in a car can really hold back both the designers and engineers. There's only so much iterating that they can do before it gets played out, boring, or downright weird. Take a look at the rear tribar lights of the giugiaro for example. It bastardizes the whole point of having a design element that everyone instantly recognizes. They would've been better off starting from scratch and coming up with something totally new and different.It was based off the Ford Falcon. Yea design wise it is unique... to Ford and in general as a class of sports car.
Personally I think this whole OneFord thing should be more than just about sharing across platforms and unity among Ford vehicles but be about having a more cohesive design language within each brand. The mustang brand would benefit from a clearly defined design stamp. Each generations styling is all over the place and we have whole decades that are complete outliers (Fox being most obvious).
The mustang brand could benefit from a unified look going forward. I dont think it has to be boring or look the same each generation. They should take a page from Aston Martin which I think has done a great job at evolving its design while staying relevant.
My point is, if you start saying that the Mustang must have triple rear lights, side scallops, a wide mouthy grille/shark nose, a dorito floating window, etc etc, its designers will be handcuffed to think outside the box.
Sponsored