Sponsored

18 Convertible GT PP1 alignment specs

barron64

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jul 25, 2018
Threads
20
Messages
421
Reaction score
500
Location
Auburn, AL
Vehicle(s)
2018 Mustang GT convertible PP1, 6sp, 2006 Toyota Tundra Dbl Cab 4x4, 2009 Acura MDX, 2007 Toyota FJ Cruiser
Convertible GT PP1 alignment specs for front camber show -0.74, +- 0.75, for both sides...For the PP1 coupe the range is -1.03, +-0.75.
The rear camber for convertible PP1 is -1.19, +-0.75 for both sides vs coupe PP1 of -1.50, +- 0.75.
Any thoughts on why the coupe would have more negative camber, as factory specified, for both front & rear?
I have been thinking about some Steeda camber plates and setting front closer to coupe specs...Any input would be appreciated.
Sponsored

 

Norm Peterson

corner barstool sitter
Joined
Jul 22, 2013
Threads
11
Messages
9,011
Reaction score
4,721
Location
On a corner barstool not too far from I-95
First Name
Norm
Vehicle(s)
'08 GT #85, '19 WRX
Just off the top of my head, Ford probably expects convertible owners to normally drive somewhat less "enthusiastically" through the corners than coupe owners.


Norm
 
OP
OP
barron64

barron64

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jul 25, 2018
Threads
20
Messages
421
Reaction score
500
Location
Auburn, AL
Vehicle(s)
2018 Mustang GT convertible PP1, 6sp, 2006 Toyota Tundra Dbl Cab 4x4, 2009 Acura MDX, 2007 Toyota FJ Cruiser
Just off the top of my head, Ford probably expects convertible owners to normally drive somewhat less "enthusiastically" through the corners than coupe owners.


Norm
Well this convertible owner had a turbo Miata before, lol.
 

Cardude99

Well-Known Member
Joined
Feb 14, 2016
Threads
69
Messages
2,473
Reaction score
1,060
Location
Phoenix, AZ
First Name
Sam
Vehicle(s)
2018 Ecoboost
Well this convertible owner had a turbo Miata before, lol.
But most are just getting one to cruise, your an outlier. Long live us outlier's
 
OP
OP
barron64

barron64

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jul 25, 2018
Threads
20
Messages
421
Reaction score
500
Location
Auburn, AL
Vehicle(s)
2018 Mustang GT convertible PP1, 6sp, 2006 Toyota Tundra Dbl Cab 4x4, 2009 Acura MDX, 2007 Toyota FJ Cruiser
A612CFB6-8532-4533-89AB-1CC935F2ABAF.jpeg
I was cruising at the track the other day...lol.
 

Sponsored

OP
OP
barron64

barron64

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jul 25, 2018
Threads
20
Messages
421
Reaction score
500
Location
Auburn, AL
Vehicle(s)
2018 Mustang GT convertible PP1, 6sp, 2006 Toyota Tundra Dbl Cab 4x4, 2009 Acura MDX, 2007 Toyota FJ Cruiser
Any reason to not set up camber to coupe specs? -1.03 in front & -1.50 in rear
 

Norm Peterson

corner barstool sitter
Joined
Jul 22, 2013
Threads
11
Messages
9,011
Reaction score
4,721
Location
On a corner barstool not too far from I-95
First Name
Norm
Vehicle(s)
'08 GT #85, '19 WRX
There's no reason to stop at the factory-preferred coupe specs either. As long as your driving - on average - supports the use of more aggressive settings. You might even want front camber to be more negative than rear camber.


Norm
 
OP
OP
barron64

barron64

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jul 25, 2018
Threads
20
Messages
421
Reaction score
500
Location
Auburn, AL
Vehicle(s)
2018 Mustang GT convertible PP1, 6sp, 2006 Toyota Tundra Dbl Cab 4x4, 2009 Acura MDX, 2007 Toyota FJ Cruiser
There's no reason to stop at the factory-preferred coupe specs either. As long as your driving - on average - supports the use of more aggressive settings. You might even want front camber to be more negative than rear camber.


Norm
Been looking through a bunch of alignment threads...Thoughts on -1.5 front & -1.2 rear camber? As for toe, 0.0 to -0.03 for front, 0.10-0.12 for rear? All stock PP1 suspension & factory tire/wheel combo. About to order Steeda camber plates however. Just looking for an alignment that enhances street driving on curvy/mountain roads and an occasional track day or so.
 

Norm Peterson

corner barstool sitter
Joined
Jul 22, 2013
Threads
11
Messages
9,011
Reaction score
4,721
Location
On a corner barstool not too far from I-95
First Name
Norm
Vehicle(s)
'08 GT #85, '19 WRX
Sounds entirely do-able. Though zero to +0.03 front toe might be a little better for a mainly street-driven car.


Norm
 

Sponsored

Cardude99

Well-Known Member
Joined
Feb 14, 2016
Threads
69
Messages
2,473
Reaction score
1,060
Location
Phoenix, AZ
First Name
Sam
Vehicle(s)
2018 Ecoboost
Sounds entirely do-able. Though zero to +0.03 front toe might be a little better for a mainly street-driven car.


Norm
What toe would u prefer for a car that is a 50/50 split? Autox and street car
 

Norm Peterson

corner barstool sitter
Joined
Jul 22, 2013
Threads
11
Messages
9,011
Reaction score
4,721
Location
On a corner barstool not too far from I-95
First Name
Norm
Vehicle(s)
'08 GT #85, '19 WRX
Depending on what the streets around you are like, toe out (+toe) can be tiring to drive with.

Where I live, on a car that I did autocross (not a Mustang, but which had poly-bushed control arms), a little +toe was too twitchy for the street duty . . . it wanted to go every which way except straight. I don't remember how far + it was, but I doubt it was much more than about +0.1° total.


Norm
 

Dominant1

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jun 17, 2016
Threads
94
Messages
3,737
Reaction score
1,127
Location
USA
First Name
Dr Frankenstang
Vehicle(s)
2016 gt/cs auto 3:55 gears
Vehicle Showcase
1
Mine is lowered “1 all the around. got it professionally aligned for performance, here are the results, the car handles perfectly..

https://ibb.co/bRtdcNq
 

Norm Peterson

corner barstool sitter
Joined
Jul 22, 2013
Threads
11
Messages
9,011
Reaction score
4,721
Location
On a corner barstool not too far from I-95
First Name
Norm
Vehicle(s)
'08 GT #85, '19 WRX
Clearly aimed at optimizing straight line performance . . . sounds like the alignment tech understands a lot more about alignment than just putting the indicators in the green and shoving it out the door. Being willing to work with customer preferences is a huge plus.


Norm
Sponsored

 
 




Top