Search results

I'm talking about "useless safety features".

Without a doubt. The convertible is more of a shock because you can feel a decent difference between S197 coupe and convertible - the convertible is sloppier and doesn't hold its composure as well. Several other things as well.

I'll just say the new convertible drives much better than the current. Body is solid.

Both sorta. Lights are last to be production tooled intentionally.

Those are cutouts. When I say placeholder, I mean taillights that have the same shape. The insides are thrown together to function as taillights. The actual material is not representative either.

What do you mean?

I think the whole car is the highlight to be honest. The headlights are the same way as the taillights. This is normal for any vehicle.

Very few have seen the production tail lights. Prototype vehicles have place holder, shape representative lights. That will take a little more time. I have yet to understand the water bottle look comments. I don't see it.

1.0 EB I3 That's not the end. You'll see more soon enough.

There is no EB 2.5

I think you took what I said the wrong way a little. All I'm trying to say is if one side of the equation is slightly off, the other side is slightly off, at best. Surveys use psychological tricks and techniques to produce desired answers.

Do tell what :)

I think this should be obvious that it is intentional.

Very fun to drive. In fact, I'm driving one tomorrow and a 1.0. And another fun to drive car...

Let me reiterate. The half camo spy shots are the real deal. Keep in mind, perspective, angle of view, and the camo Velcro left on the front end create some distortion of what the transition looks like from the front fascia to the hood and fenders. The S550 is very "fastbacky".

More defined, less rounded/smoothed off.

:)

They are much more pronounced.

It's not.

chazcron's renders are far closer, especially the rear end. This article spews inaccurate guesses and assumptions all the way around.