So what I read into this, is that you have some inside scoop (you live in the great lakes reagion no less ;) ). So you know at this point the car will no be lighter?
Or do you just know the weight of the IRS?
That's most likely a fancy way of saying they made the front subframe that holds the suspension and engine together more stout.
Along the lines of what the aftermaret has done for years...
Yeah, except I'm sure that just because the M4 RETAILS for twice as much, it actually costs 2x to produce...
Markups on those things are supposedly huge, so in reality the actual cost of the two cars is a lot closer than you think.
Looking at these again and again, I have to say, that the frontend of the Camaro looks sharp after the refresh. I like it just a little more than the Mustang's from dead on frontal shots. As soon as the angle changes though, it's game over for the camaro, even a 3/4 front shot looks better for...
Nobody is going to boost an auto at 2k either, because it will downshift when you floor it.
Not sure why you are on a war path with i4 turbos... Got your heart broken by one or something?
:lol:
AGP delta 46 DBB.
Sorry, no dyno plot on hand.
And no, I don't boost it at 2k rpm... Jeez, who would do that?
If you want low end grunt, get a chevy...
@Oldman.
You need to look up some SRT4s my friend.
Mine in the 400s to the wheels with full boost at about 2800 rpm, holding it to almost 6500.
Yes, it is perfectly streetable engine wise, traction however is not. LOL
I love the shot from the top.
The S550 looks twice as wide as the current car.
While it's only a few inches wider, the repositioning of the c-pillars was a genious move that adds so much to the looks.
Love it.