Search results

I'm curious as well, it looks to have much longer runners than the oem manifold, with a slightly larger plenum, hopefully it turns out to be a hidden gem that will probably emberass current offerings in the tq department but still put out descent hp numbers, only the dyno will tell......I will...

got that all sorted, it was comparing a first tune file to a revised version (i was unaware at the time) but after reviewing available data in hp tuners the 2016 f series manifold does have a marginally larger (than the gt350 i currently have installed) manifold volume under the transient tab...

Can anyone post a link? Disregard...found it...very interesting

Im almost as excited as you are for these results, if these cams put out like a cheap date, my credit card will receive punishment

That's a lot smaller than it looks...9 lb/ft and again a toss up because it disappears shortly after....at 4500 the stock TB produces the same size bump over the 350

The 5 to 8 ish hp/tq difference between the two runs in the bottom end I attribute to the dyno fudge factor....start to finish these runs were pretty much dead even And it's possible that a full blown dyno tune could eek out a couple more for each setup but I'm positive the result would remain...

No problem at all, and I do believe once cams are added that the added airflow potential should be beneficial....but on a stock cam car the tb is just bling factor, although the throttle response from the gt350 tb does negate the need for a sprint booster type signal manipulation device, so the...

thanks man, trying it now

Adding the photo, shortly photobucket still doesnt work yet

Update!! Here is the dyno pull from this morning comparing the stock and gt350 tb on identical tunes with timing locked at 27 degrees [/IMG] the lines overlap, mind you my "stock" tb is ported so take that for what its worth...also these are the best pulls from each.

Damn right it will, youve got the cams for it, im really looking forward to your follow up post/dyno sheet, as cams are my next logical step.....but nobody, except for you, has stepped up and produced numbers....by chance did you baseline the car? Also look into getting that tb ported, camaro...

I agree, with the time and r&d spent on that motor the ford racing billet setup should have been the only choice, or steel, something besides the least expensive option

Also, in regards to anything car related but cubic inches and tire width, bigger is not always better.....no you cant downsize the tb on the voodoo 5.2 and make more power.....its a bigger displacement motor with more aggressive heads and cams....the 5.0 doesnt necessarily need the additional tb...

Ok before everybody gets on the "theres no way thats right" train i will acknowledge the fact that that was a year ago and the first attempt of anyone outside of ford making an attempt at tuning that tb (ive been lund tuned throughout ownership), so be patient a real comparison will happen shortly

Voodoo the harmonics between a fpc and traditional crank are vastly different, ford acknowledged this as being the biggest hurdle with the voodoo 5.2....but the fact these motors share the same opg leads me to believe that without the additional stress of any crank driven power adders the oil...

Just recently lund got the gt350 tb dialed in, so he sent me a timing locked tune (27 degrees) for both the stock and gt350 tb for dyno comparison purposes, so as soon as i get time im going to hopefully shed light on this....hopefully tomorrow the dyno is free as im off work.....i also plan on...

I would imagine the extra harmonics from the fpc have played a huge role in the failures

I haven't, and rev to 8k....apparently we have the same opgs as the gt350...most of your issues come from crank driven forced induction

93 octane...Im waiting for a local station to start supplying e85...the store owner polled local shops and folks at the drag strip and now plans to install an e85 tank FWIW I'm running pypes stepped catted headers, and still on the stock (ported) throttle body

I thought I posted the updated Dyno sheet here, but apparently not.....photobucket is currently acting up but on the same tune and dyno as before, only change being longtubes, the car put down 445 hp....I'll post the sheet asap as well as an updated Dyno on my current tune revision