Search results

I had one sold to someone else after I put down a deposit once... that nearly got ugly but they came around without and attorney. I was just a little less than happy about it at the time. :thumbsup: It turned into part of me getting 7k off the one I did buy and this was a 1991, with an MSRP...

What? They went from 225? Welcome to 1993 and even then, it was probably off and often rated as low as 205. In 94/95, the same power rating... in 1996, basically the same, though many claimed 215... Now we get into the massive jump thing... 1999, 260hp 2005, 300hp 2007ish, 305-315 depending...

Thanks for adding all these pics! As cool as it is and looks, the more I see of it, the less I want one... I may get the F-150 instead, but I will drive both before deciding. The truck is far more useful while the car is far more fun... If I didn't already have 3 Mustangs, maybe it would be more...

Those two things together, simply don't make sense. Forge it all and soak up the other 2 dollars per car... sheesh. My Escape loses as much as 8hp according to the various ratings. What it feels like, however, is a more sluggish acceleration and a seemingly slower throttle response. When I feel...

In agreement with others, that's simply untrue. Even if anyone were foolish enough or, conversely, had the will power to drive a steady 49mph(what a joke), the economy won't likely be 40mpg unless the road is either flat or downhill. Regardless, the Camaro is much heavier, uses an almost totally...

The 2010 Fusion weighed in @ or above 3600 lb with the 3.5L V6, up to 3800 with AWD. The current Fusion is much lighter, starting around 3250. It has no V6 option either. With that, it's also not available with as much power as the last. Even the Hybrid is nearly 200 lb lighter, but the full...

20%? Is it that much without options? I haven't actually looked enough to notice, but that is a big increase between the two upgrades. The 2.3L will be able to handle plenty, but there's little doubt overall, it's not likely to beat the 5L w/o suffering terribly in areas as important as...

The numbers aren't to be taken as accurate just yet. Steeda has admitted, they didn't actually weigh the car. Maybe they really have weighed it too, and made up a bogus number to fuel the fire. Guarantee yourself this... Ford has NOT authorized Steeda or any other company to disclose this...

Heh... WISHFUL thinking! 1st, they surely have strict orders from Ford. 2nd, they MIGHT be playing a mean joke on their competition. 3rd, why would they say now, considering they have the car and their competition has to wait for the car, giving them an extreme advantage in the aftermarket...

As for the weight itself, a bit more is normal, all things considered. 200+ lb more... Nahhhh... I'll believe that when I see it. It has always made me question, about various manufacturers, why cut your option list short on this model vs that, when it's the same overall vehicle?? Taking away...

I'm not so sure I'd have worded it quite that way... :lol:

I thought people were kinda pissed that rev-match will NOT be available on the MT-82, just the 6R80(auto)??? If that is offered, the MT82 just got better altogether! It's already a fine transmission and I've also heard it needs simple fixes like what we used to call "shift dogs," but I have...

Rather than spend the next few months in debate over it, I'll hide and watch... My true hope is the same in that I merely hope all you guys who think you're experts about an item we've never even seen tested, aren't also very disappointed in terms of performance gains. To believe what many here...

HOLY MOLY! I didn't even know that magazine still existed... I thought it was eaten by MM&FF... On the other hand, I see the "name change" online... anyway, I do hope it's right

Altitude plays a role, for sure. Short of settling for the 2.3L EB... add the supercharger or turbo to the GT! All better?? YUP!:D

Drive it like ya STOLE IT!

Probably just left out "V8" or "5L" there, not considering the 2.3L because it wouldn't be part of a GT350 package. That said, we're still only hoping. Heck, we're still only hoping to get the true and real specs on the 15 GT! For that matter, true and complete specs altogether would be nice...

I hope so because it not only saves money, but the 8.8 is really and truly, hard to beat! :ford:

Yup... that's part of what I was saying! :thumbsup: Again, I don't care that Ford is using IRS. I just know that it's not as great as people think it is and feelings are bound to be hurt when people realize just how good the old "archaic" SLA really is... More than a few, I think, will have a...

Considering the transmission there and the gears there, what would you do then, drop to 2.73's? 3.08's? Using 4 anythings isn't going to improve economy, that's for sure. Btw, if the IRS isn't an 8.8, those gear sets we've all come to know as a relatively cheap upgrade may won't be available.