Sponsored
engineermike's latest activity
-
engineermike reacted to SheepDog's post in the thread E85 and boost without return system with
Haha.
But not everyone is a mad scientist/genius level tuning wizard. -
engineermike reacted to wingnutt's post in the thread E85 and boost without return system with Haha.
oh hell no, you tune your own because you have the time/tools/talent to interpret all the stuffs...might as well be speaking Russian to...
-
engineermike replied to the thread E85 and boost without return system.This is why I tune my own. I get to decide what I will tune for.
-
engineermike replied to the thread E85 and boost without return system.Yes, resistance to change and some level of laziness. Why develop new better stuff when you can keep selling the same thing since 2012...
-
engineermike reacted to wingnutt's post in the thread E85 and boost without return system with Like.
most of us dinosaurs tend to resist change, even if itās a better option š
-
engineermike replied to the thread Torco+ pump gas for dual tune on a 3.8 Whipple?.To me, thatās the implication, like pcmtecās customos.
-
engineermike replied to the thread Torco+ pump gas for dual tune on a 3.8 Whipple?.Right I wouldnāt call that a dual tune. Iād just call it two tunes but I guess thatās semantics. I donāt generally like witches brew...
-
engineermike replied to the thread Torco+ pump gas for dual tune on a 3.8 Whipple?.What boost level? What compression? And what do you mean by dual tune?
-
engineermike reacted to Headless Horseman's post in the thread My KPM800 track test (KPM 800HP Track Pack Fuel Pump) with Like.
This is cool info! I've seen so many complaints about this. There's the disagreement over the return style being prehistoric. Then the...
-
engineermike replied to the thread 2021 Roush Mustang Tuning (issue).The 2021 Roush are widely unlocked and easily tunable. Your tuner is either blowing smoke or has no clue what he's doing. There is...
-
You are standing right there, trace it out...
-
engineermike replied to the thread going Supercharged.Manā¦I would love to install superchargers for $2900 a piece. Thatās over $200 an hour!
-
engineermike replied to the thread Fuel pump: KPM 800 VS DW 400? Pluses and minuses? on 202x MACH 1..My mistake; I thought all the KPM buckets had twin pumps. That being the case, the FPDM diagnostics shouldn't be an issue.
-
engineermike reacted to robvas's post in the thread Roush supercharged, now idles rough at start up then smooths out with Like.
If your tuner has to crank the idle way up, they don't know what they're doing.
-
engineermike replied to the thread Fuel pump: KPM 800 VS DW 400? Pluses and minuses? on 202x MACH 1..If Iām understanding correctly, the kpm800 powers two pumps off of a single fpdm. This being the case, you do lose some level of...
-
engineermike replied to the thread going Supercharged.Well hang on to that stock balancer because they are rare and better than all the other stock coyote balancers.
-
engineermike replied to the thread going Supercharged.The first pic looks aftermarket but the second looks like a stock ford viscous style.
-
engineermike replied to the thread going Supercharged.Good question. I recall they changed mid-2019 so āmaybeā. You can tell by looking at them. Post a pic if you want but the...
-
engineermike replied to the thread going Supercharged.Yes it comes with the better viscous damper that ford only installed in 2018.
-
engineermike replied to the thread The damn fuel pump issue......So you know you can't fill the bucket with fuel you pulled from the bucket right? What's this in reference to?
-
engineermike replied to the thread 10R80 Downshift Response Improvement.I think I see the problem....much like there's a difference between drive mode and shift character, there is also a difference between...
-
engineermike replied to the thread 10R80 Downshift Response Improvement.Yes, I know the eco shift schedules are defined in HPT. But if the eco schedule isn't actually assigned to a drive mode then changing...
-
engineermike replied to the thread 10R80 Downshift Response Improvement.PCMTec many times the tuning parameters and probably 1000x the logging parameters vs its major competitor. It's not for beginners, but...
-
engineermike reacted to mejohn50's post in the thread 10R80 Downshift Response Improvement with Haha.
This is going to be fun to watch.
-
engineermike replied to the thread 10R80 Downshift Response Improvement.Sorry but I'm NOT talking about the shift character assignment table (ECM20044, auF66748). I'm talking about assigning the shift...
-
engineermike replied to the thread 10R80 Downshift Response Improvement.@ZXMustang to be clear, the table auF66752 that the thread is about isn't defined in hptuners. It assigns the shift schedules to the...
-
The boost on the stock gauge should be correct. Roush kit changes to a map sensor that provides boost/ vacuum
-
engineermike replied to the thread The damn fuel pump issue......Maybe, but you said "you want to keep the bucket full all the time in all driving conditions" which would include WOT at 1/3 tank of...
-
engineermike replied to the thread The damn fuel pump issue......I have not.
-
engineermike replied to the thread The damn fuel pump issue......Ideally yes and I completely agree, but next to no one with a modded Mustang can claim theirs does that. Under hard cornering or with...
-
I sliced off the unused sound tube tab on the shock tower and made a simple bracket to mount the large Radium Filter. There's even a...
-
engineermike replied to the thread Gen3 NA Build - Speed Density Conversion & Tuning.The use-case for NA isn't as strong as SC or turbo but still exists. The Ford logic is determining the properties of the air in the...
-
engineermike replied to the thread Gen3 NA Build - Speed Density Conversion & Tuning.@geddys any chance you can use liveos to switch it from maf to sd?
-
engineermike replied to the thread Gen3 NA Build - Speed Density Conversion & Tuning.The VMP harness appears to just use the MCT temp from the MAP sensor (T-MAP) to get the signal into the PCM. It's not a SD conversion...
-
engineermike reacted to diambo4life's post in the thread BL Fabrications 88/96 turbo install on 2019 Bullitt with Like.
Make sure to pressure test your fuel system, coolant and oil systems before putting everything back together because Murphy's law says...
-
engineermike replied to the thread Gen3 NA Build - Speed Density Conversion & Tuning.All ecoboost are map. There are lots of advantages dealing with dynamics. If you saw the math that goes on your head would explode...
-
engineermike replied to the thread Gen3 NA Build - Speed Density Conversion & Tuning.Page 21 and 22 showing the Roush wiring diagram to incorporate the MAP sensor, with the signal going to the IMRC connectors. Salesforce...
-
engineermike replied to the thread Gen3 NA Build - Speed Density Conversion & Tuning.Subscribing. I'm very interested in this because it's the only "correct" way to make the Ford throttle control logic work with a PD...
-
The user. I'd guess a lawyer rather than an engineer. Nothing is stopping you from installing one of those systems on this car...
-
engineermike replied to the thread The damn fuel pump issue......Supplying enough fuel for a drag car or occasional street blasts is completely different from top speed runs and track days, especially...
-
engineermike replied to the thread Why not a 5.9L Coyote?.itās nothing exotic. It just squeezes the ring pack together. Iām not saying itās impossible or even impractical. It just compromises...
-
engineermike replied to the thread Why not a 5.9L Coyote?.Cool idea but unlikely to make it into a mass produced ford engine.
-
engineermike reacted to MyStang's post in the thread You gotta admit... this is quite clever! with Haha.
Wow You are old as dirt! š
-
Iād love to see the specifics of that GT3 motor to know how they got 5.4 out of itā¦
-
engineermike replied to the thread Why not a 5.9L Coyote?.As I mentioned, I did all the math and research regarding stroking the short deck coyote. Thereās only so much distance between the...
-
-
engineermike replied to the thread Why not a 5.9L Coyote?.Every time I check, these superchargers get heavier.
-
It's up to 200lbs now? Also the e ray is 400lbs heavier than the stingray and costs $40,000 more Sure, there are other differences but...
-
engineermike replied to the thread The damn fuel pump issue......The gen3 bucket fill rate from a single saddle side is sufficient at the stock power level on gasoline. Othwise it needs to fill from...
-
engineermike replied to the thread Why not a 5.9L Coyote?.@zackmd1 even with a short ev-only range and reduced power, the vast majority of driving is done close to home and at light load so even...
-
engineermike replied to the thread Why not a 5.9L Coyote?.Brian Wolfe hit the nail on the head in one of his interviews. He said the oems/govt went all-in on electric too soon. The only...
