Sponsored

My Baseline Dyno

Rodsaleen

Well-Known Member
Joined
Aug 1, 2017
Threads
24
Messages
196
Reaction score
75
Location
Kansas
Vehicle(s)
2018 Orange Fury Mustang GT
Sponsored

 

92 Couper

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jun 15, 2016
Threads
18
Messages
165
Reaction score
156
Location
Dacula (Atlanta) Georgia
Vehicle(s)
2016 Mustang GT Premium PP - Competition Orange
A10 or M6?
 

Sponsored

UAmach1

Bullitt Hopefull
Joined
Oct 10, 2017
Threads
58
Messages
1,757
Reaction score
546
Location
PA
Vehicle(s)
Ford/INFINITI

ihc95

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jul 16, 2014
Threads
15
Messages
812
Reaction score
706
Location
NJ
Vehicle(s)
2018 GTPP A10 401A
Like many others, it hit the speed limiter. Probably had another 10whp or so left it in.
 
OP
OP
Rodsaleen

Rodsaleen

Well-Known Member
Joined
Aug 1, 2017
Threads
24
Messages
196
Reaction score
75
Location
Kansas
Vehicle(s)
2018 Orange Fury Mustang GT
Like many others, it hit the speed limiter. Probably had another 10whp or so left it in.
Yep. He said the dyno didn't like being spun that fast.
 

Sponsored

Zeke.Malvo

Well-Known Member
Joined
Feb 3, 2017
Threads
0
Messages
93
Reaction score
23
Location
CA
Vehicle(s)
1969 Mach1
Those numbers are a little on the low end compared to some. They showed inflated STD numbers, SAE would have been ~393-397rwhp / 368-372rwtq. They aren't bad numbers tho, but seems most hit a bit more SAE.

That said, although close, all dynos are not directly comparable.
 

Zeke.Malvo

Well-Known Member
Joined
Feb 3, 2017
Threads
0
Messages
93
Reaction score
23
Location
CA
Vehicle(s)
1969 Mach1
Like many others, it hit the speed limiter. Probably had another 10whp or so left it in.
Most Ive seen peak right where this one peaked. I'm willing to bet that it would have made 5rwhp more at the very most, but most likely would have began falling off.
 

Freedom

Well-Known Member
Joined
Feb 18, 2016
Threads
28
Messages
1,048
Reaction score
317
Location
California
Vehicle(s)
'16 GT, '22 Tesla Model 3, '22 F-150 Lightning
12% loss. This seems much more normal than the 430s dyno but atleast shows that the 10 speed is really efficient.
 

Zeke.Malvo

Well-Known Member
Joined
Feb 3, 2017
Threads
0
Messages
93
Reaction score
23
Location
CA
Vehicle(s)
1969 Mach1
12% loss. This seems much more normal than the 430s dyno but atleast shows that the 10 speed is really efficient.
More like 14% driveline losses considering SAE corrected would put it at ~395rwhp.
 

Grimace427

Well-Known Member
Joined
Dec 6, 2013
Threads
14
Messages
6,470
Reaction score
1,699
Location
NoVA
Vehicle(s)
2011 Mustang 5.0
Thank you! Even after decades of drivetrain improvements, still 15% parasitic loss...

Dyno's don't measure drivetrain loss. Put this car on a different dyno and it will read a different number, especially if the other dyno is of a different type(inertia/eddy current).
Sponsored

 
 




Top