Sponsored

JLT 2016 GT350 dyno video

Status
Not open for further replies.

Jay@JLTPerformance

Well-Known Member
Joined
Oct 6, 2014
Threads
10
Messages
147
Reaction score
77
Location
Chesapeake
Vehicle(s)
2015 Ford Mustang
Here's a little bit of what went down yesterday.
More to come as we test another car this Sunday.

[ame="[MEDIA=youtube]ZWoMLrQ2D0s[/MEDIA]"]
Sponsored

 

ITLRUN

HiPo Joe
Joined
Dec 20, 2014
Threads
42
Messages
834
Reaction score
902
Location
Adairsville, GA
First Name
Joe
Vehicle(s)
2017 GT350R HR186
Hopefully my JLT CAI will be delivered tomorrow! I'll have the car soon there after.
 

combustor

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jun 25, 2015
Threads
16
Messages
224
Reaction score
180
Location
GA
Vehicle(s)
2018 GT350R, 2016 GT350
Hopefully my JLT CAI will be delivered tomorrow! I'll have the car soon there after.
Yeah buddy! Mine is coming soon too! Who are you going to go tune with? I know very little about this stuff but I'm trying to learn.
 

eric n

HNIC/Head Ninja in Charge
Joined
Oct 19, 2013
Threads
39
Messages
859
Reaction score
305
Location
Bakersfield, CA
Website
www.ericnolan.com
First Name
Eric
Vehicle(s)
16 Shelby RR B&W stripes GT350 G0249
I have no doubt that JLT makes a super high quality item. I've run JLT cai on my last 2 mustangs. That said, this motor is such a new level of tech I'm going to wait a bit to see what experiences other have.
 

Sponsored

R 350 gt Donson

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jan 14, 2015
Threads
25
Messages
1,823
Reaction score
756
Location
Dallas Texas
First Name
Don
Vehicle(s)
2017 F250, F10 BMW M-Sport 2019 GT2
So everyone else get a base line "stock" of 470 and yours is 448.... something is wrong here....why is this? Car and Driver got 471...you and the other performance guys showing the new tunes get really low numbers. This does not make sense...
 

Todd15Fastback

Well-Known Member
Joined
Dec 10, 2013
Threads
80
Messages
10,523
Reaction score
3,883
Location
Atlanta, GA
First Name
Todd
Vehicle(s)
2015 Mustang GT PP Fastback
So everyone else get a base line "stock" of 470 and yours is 448.... something is wrong here....why is this? Car and Driver got 471...you and the other performance guys showing the new tunes get really low numbers. This does not make sense...
likely done on a Mustang dyno and not a dynojet.
 

ohtobbad

Well-Known Member
Joined
Nov 17, 2014
Threads
15
Messages
1,444
Reaction score
649
Location
Nova Scotia
Vehicle(s)
GT350R
I have no doubt that JLT makes a super high quality item. I've run JLT cai on my last 2 mustangs. That said, this motor is such a new level of tech I'm going to wait a bit to see what experiences other have.
I agree, let someone else be a guinea pig with the mods.
See what they get and what they blow up LOL>
 

bdub85

Well-Known Member
Joined
Nov 9, 2015
Threads
11
Messages
733
Reaction score
340
Location
MD
First Name
Bobby
Vehicle(s)
2016 GT350 Track Package Shadow Black
Mustang dynos read significantly lower but they are the best dynos imo because they put a load on the car unlike dynojets.
 

_M_

Well-Known Member
Joined
Sep 28, 2014
Threads
34
Messages
1,195
Reaction score
509
Location
Planet Earth
Vehicle(s)
A Mustang
Okay...wow really a big difference....did not know if there was any "sand-bagging" on the numbers...:shrug:
I think the question here would be if they did the same test on the other dynos, do they see similar gains? Not what one dyno reads versus another.

If they did this test on other dynos and didn't see similar gains, then I would raise an eyebrow, but this delta doesn't even make me think twice about it.
Sponsored

 
Status
Not open for further replies.
 








Top