Which stance looks better???

[Ultrakla$$ic]

A. LOWERED FRONT AND BACK:

B. JUST THE FRONT LOWERED:

Sponsored

 

[Quiksilver15]

Front and back! Too much rake for my taste

 

[whirledpeaz]

Front and Back. Remember air-shocks?

Love the car. Now get some gtpp wheels!

 

[Khyber]

both of course!

 

[Zodiac]

I'll go with B. A looks too low. B just looks less low thanks to the rear.

 

[MELLOWYELLOW06]

I prefer b Darren

 

[rvlyssup]

I have BMR springs installed so I vote B as well.

 

[NWs550]

Gotta go with A for me.

 

[BOBS550]

Both look good but I vote for B I am surprised you have your Stang out off the garage:eyebulge:

 

[flying dutchman]

Just the front. In the day (I'm a bit older) we used to always jack the back of the cars up and put on really big tires. I think that just lowering the front kind of duplicates that. Just my opinion...

 

[smitty]

I like both, but choice B would be the better look with a more mild rake IMO. Of course I'm in my 50's and like the subtle muscle car (oxymoron) look A mild rake with staggered tire sizes is in my car's future.

 

[Jeff's FRC]

Lower front and back for sure! If you want a little rake, just make sure to use springs that lower the front more than the rear. My CJPP springs lower the front 1.5" and rear 1". The stance is perfect!

 

[BmacIL]

Neither. Too much drop.

 

[CompO5.sl0w]

A, Too much rear fender gap in B.

 

[Jeff's FRC]

Neither. Too much drop.

I didn't see a stock ride height option in the OP.

Do you just like the stock ride height, or are you running some aftermarket springs? What is the perfect drop in your opinion?

Sponsored