GT Livernois Dyno progression. With graphs

[Anthony]

Wow, talk about butt hurt.

You're making an assumption about an automotive tuning tool. Has nothing to do with their record or who they are. Ask Livernois if they believe his car is making over 460 at the crank as delivered..... BTW, they work very closely with Ford, I'm sure they know the answer.

Another point, the days of factory freak cars are very few and far between. Engine tolerances and computer controls are so tight today, the days of yesteryear are gone.

30 cars on dynojets, whoopty doo. Most people know dynojets are happy dyno's.

Let the OP run the car at the track...... that will prove who's full of shit or not.


"lot of Richard swingers on the Internet these days." Lot's of ignorant children too.

Yep. Lot of them think it's ok to make a pass in the low 10's with no bar either.

Rocks and glass houses

Sponsored

 

[Todd15Fastback]

Wow, talk about butt hurt.

You're making an assumption about an automotive tuning tool. Has nothing to do with their record or who they are. Ask Livernois if they believe his car is making over 460 at the crank as delivered..... BTW, they work very closely with Ford, I'm sure they know the answer.

Another point, the days of factory freak cars are very few and far between. Engine tolerances and computer controls are so tight today, the days of yesteryear are gone.

30 cars on dynojets, whoopty doo. Most people know dynojets are happy dyno's.

Let the OP run the car at the track...... that will prove who's full of shit or not.


"lot of Richard swingers on the Internet these days." Lot's of ignorant children too.

I hope to be a know it all like you, hopefully very soon.

Some of these owners also had 11-14's that put down less HP on the same dyno's. All SAE corrected. I know the numbers can be off and I am sure they are. Never said it was gospel.

You are the one stating his numbers are off and likely off by a lot. What about other cars with the same mods putting down about the same RWHP but on different dynos, in different states with different weather conditions. Your statement came across as fact when you have zero to backup your assumption.


Not a child. I don't go posting BS in someone's else thread and act like a know it all.

Thank god for the ignore feature:cheers:

 

[2c5s]

Ok. Your bringing "fact"

What rwhp do the 15 5.0's make?

Your bringing fact, bring it big boy.

I can define "fact" if you like also, so make sure your answer fits the statement YOU made.

Obviously 395 according to you. Post your slip tiger. I'll be waiting....

 

[2c5s]

Yep. Lot of them think it's ok to make a pass in the low 10's with no bar either.

Rocks and glass houses

And numerous 9 second passes. I also skydive. Plus I scubadive with sharks..... Thanks for the concern...

 

[Moderator]

Cleaned up and members have been warned. This goes to everyone - if you can't debate a topic without insulting other members, stay out of the forums.

 

[Mark5825]

Quick question on those graphs it looks like you are getting past the redline or am I looking at it wrong?

 

[beefcake]

Quick question on those graphs it looks like you are getting past the redline or am I looking at it wrong?

depends on what your wanting as far as redline

only point of going so far past peak power, put our 2011 car we shift at 8000, with a boss pcm in it, with the 15's, I think we have pulled them to 8500 or so

 

[09jsw]

depends on what your wanting as far as redline

only point of going so far past peak power, put our 2011 car we shift at 8000, with a boss pcm in it, with the 15's, I think we have pulled them to 8500 or so

Stock engine 2015 to 8500 rpm? Jesus

 

[Rockstar]

I will just say either he got a Mustang with a really strong engine which is very possible or yes the dyno is a little high. Either way the main point for me is that he dyno'd on the same dyno for all his parts and he legitimately pick up 50HP and 45lbft of torque with bolt-ons and I still think that's awesome!! Great job, I too most likely will be going with Livernois tuning!

 

[Todd15Fastback]

I will just say either he got a Mustang with a really strong engine which is very possible or yes the dyno is a little high. Either way the main point for me is that he dyno'd on the same dyno for all his parts and he legitimately pick up 50HP and 45lbft of torque with bolt-ons and I still think that's awesome!! Great job, I too most likely will be going with Livernois tuning!

There have been a ton of folks over there that have dynoed in the 385-395RWHP range on a bonestock '15GT.

I like Livernois, too!

 

[anotherneon]

All of his dynos are also in STD and not SAE....not to mention he has ZERO track times.

 

[Todd15Fastback]

All of his dynos are also in STD and not SAE....not to mention he has ZERO track times.

Livernois has answered the STD/SAE question a few times on this forum.

 

[anotherneon]

Livernois has answered the STD/SAE question a few times on this forum.

He has, but i'd still like some track times.

 

[Rockstar]

Thanks Todd I didn't know that I am just getting back into the Mustang world and waiting to order a 2016 next month! Anyway I just posted on your Steeda thread and read lots of your posts so far and really appreciate your ideas and thoughts! I too am looking for naturally aspirated 500HP is good enough for me! My Saleen back in 1996 with the first year of the 4.6 motor put out 225HP...lol.. I had Saleen put on the first Vortech supercharger and I think the horsepower went to 300HP, man that was huge..lol.. Now we are talking 200HP more with no supercharger that is technology advancement at its best! I have had two more stangs since then but it's been about 10 years now since I have had one. I too will be using Livernois tuning and many of the items and parts you have selected we seem to think a lot alike, thanks so much!

 

[Dustin GI]

Thanks for the posting, I am in the market for a tune/cai and I appreciate you taking the time to do this. The gains look great to me.
Maybe I am missing something here but 395 does not seem way off. If you use a 13% drive train loss you would have 445 at the crank on the ops stock car. That is only 10 over stock. what am I missing? I do not have a ton of experience with this so if someone could explain where I am wrong, I would appreciate that as well.

Sponsored