Wylie C
Well-Known Member
with my 18 GT I'm getting between 17 and 20 in the city and 25 to 28 hwy depending on speed
and if it's stock it only needs 87 octane
and if it's stock it only needs 87 octane
Sponsored
32-36mpg highway in my eb. 3.31 gears 6 speed manual, 25-27 city flooring it aroundwith my 18 GT I'm getting between 17 and 20 in the city and 25 to 28 hwy depending on speed
and if it's stock it only needs 87 octane
87?!?!?!?!with my 18 GT I'm getting between 17 and 20 in the city and 25 to 28 hwy depending on speed
and if it's stock it only needs 87 octane
Turbo 4's are great like that, drive like a pissed off teenager all day averaging 30mpg. Do that in my GT and average falls 15ish lol32-36mpg highway in my eb. 3.31 gears 6 speed manual, 25-27 city flooring it around
Yeah, that was my anticipation, too. I did not even remove the license plates from the car before it being towed away, because I was honestly expecting that the car can and will be fixed.what happen to the car that looks like fixable demage or at least in Europe we have seen way worse fixed up to be sold ?
Thanks for following up it's a gorgeous car looks great the damage is a bit much mostly because of the headlamp (this fuckers are crazy expensive). Maybe worth it getting it from the lot and fixing in Bulgaria for a summer convertible . Here most of the Mustang's are from a lot in the States and yours don't look that bad. Glad you are ok and everything is sorted insurance wise. Go get your next Mustang soon.Now the car is sitting somewhere in the auction lot in California, waiting to be sold. Once someone buys it, they're free to put efforts in restoring it or tearing apart for spares. But the insurance already paid off my bank loan, so I don't care that much. (Apart of missing it, for sure.)
what's more fuel efficient? I get the turbo was added, to add more torque/power. but I know turbos can eat fuel.Get whatever you like and can afford. Some of us like the v8 and others like the eco.
Having the turbo on the Ecoboost means that it's only going to eat fuel when driving in boost, otherwise you're going to see usual 4 cylinder fuel mileage. When driving mine easy, I regularly see 24 mpg city and 34 mpg highway. However, if I'm driving it to it's limits I've seen as low as single digit mpg.what's more fuel efficient? I get the turbo was added, to add more torque/power. but I know turbos can eat fuel.
I have to imagine the v6 gets pretty comparable or actually better mpg, just with a little less power.