Sponsored

60-130mph times for boosted cars

gimmie11s

Banned
Banned
Banned
Joined
Mar 2, 2018
Threads
7
Messages
1,774
Reaction score
1,346
Location
SoCal
Vehicle(s)
Murica!
Good Lord, these cars are fast. Very nice.
Sponsored

 

Roh92cp

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jun 27, 2015
Threads
79
Messages
2,895
Reaction score
1,169
Location
Fort Kent Maine
First Name
Shawn
Vehicle(s)
OW GTPP Whipple
What's the best place to buy a dragy?
 

Zinc03svt

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jun 3, 2018
Threads
30
Messages
2,342
Reaction score
1,269
Location
usa
Vehicle(s)
stang
The dragy 60-130 mph times would be significantly slower if the cars actually started the run @ 60 mph. They are a little BS with the running start imo. Very popular with the high hp front drive and awd crowd. Not saying a 800-1000 whp is slow by any means either...
 

Sponsored

OP
OP

ttbestas

Active Member
Joined
May 12, 2016
Threads
11
Messages
43
Reaction score
3
Location
Lithuania
Vehicle(s)
2009 GT-R
for me its indication how powerful the car is. It will show how the car will do from the roll as well taking a lot of variables out when talking dig start.
 

hlfbkd420

Well-Known Member
Joined
Feb 13, 2019
Threads
13
Messages
2,192
Reaction score
2,354
Location
SW 'Merica
Website
www.youtube.com
First Name
Bilbo Hicks
Vehicle(s)
2019 GT w/ Roush P2 SC, 2015 KIA Sorento SXL
The dragy 60-130 mph times would be significantly slower if the cars actually started the run @ 60 mph. They are a little BS with the running start imo. Very popular with the high hp front drive and awd crowd. Not saying a 800-1000 whp is slow by any means either...
Yeah... I started from 59 when I did mine.. It was slower than my quarter mile time so I figured most numbers I've seen were when the car was accelerating already.
 

3beeps

Well-Known Member
Joined
Feb 13, 2016
Threads
37
Messages
911
Reaction score
408
Location
Florida
Website
www.instagram.com
Vehicle(s)
'17 GT
The dragy 60-130 mph times would be significantly slower if the cars actually started the run @ 60 mph. They are a little BS with the running start imo. Very popular with the high hp front drive and awd crowd. Not saying a 800-1000 whp is slow by any means either...
Everyone is doing 60-130 runs from below 60 mph, even from a dig. If they didn't want you to use a rolling start from below 60, they wouldn't validate the pass if you started below 60 mph. But they do validate those passes because that's the point of the metric.
 
Last edited:

Zinc03svt

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jun 3, 2018
Threads
30
Messages
2,342
Reaction score
1,269
Location
usa
Vehicle(s)
stang
I get that it focusses on the roll showing more the cars actual power versus driver skill. My point is assuming you have traction (heated tires, awd, etc.) the sooner you hit it the better time your going to have right? Take same car with traction again at 30 mph roll versus 55 mph roll? Any running start momentum is helping imo.
 

3beeps

Well-Known Member
Joined
Feb 13, 2016
Threads
37
Messages
911
Reaction score
408
Location
Florida
Website
www.instagram.com
Vehicle(s)
'17 GT
I get that it focusses on the roll showing more the cars actual power versus driver skill. My point is assuming you have traction (heated tires, awd, etc.) the sooner you hit it the better time your going to have right? Take same car with traction again at 30 mph roll versus 55 mph roll? Any running start momentum is helping imo.
You're correct that starting from 30 would benefit you (assuming you get full traction and boost by 60 mph). That's why everyone does it lol. Starting from 60 or close to it is hurting your times and it's intended to be that way.
 

Sponsored

Zinc03svt

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jun 3, 2018
Threads
30
Messages
2,342
Reaction score
1,269
Location
usa
Vehicle(s)
stang
You're correct that starting from 30 would benefit you (assuming you get full traction and boost by 60 mph). That's why everyone does it lol. Starting from 60 or close to it is hurting your times and it's intended to be that way.
Lol. That’s why it’s a little Gimmicky too me. The cars with absolute traction and lowest start mph have an advantage in that particular metric. It’s not a true start from 60 to 130 mph time. Wonder if there is a way to program a 55-58 mph required window to start as another metric?
 

3beeps

Well-Known Member
Joined
Feb 13, 2016
Threads
37
Messages
911
Reaction score
408
Location
Florida
Website
www.instagram.com
Vehicle(s)
'17 GT
I’m sure nobody runs down hill either... ;).
9CBC8E9A-9E0D-4A9E-BACC-A1774BD6C25F.jpeg
That's what I meant by validating. If you have >1% downward slope, the run is marked invalid.
 

Luce202

Well-Known Member
Joined
Mar 10, 2019
Threads
20
Messages
113
Reaction score
51
Location
Texas
First Name
Luce
Vehicle(s)
2015 fbo/paxton auto, 2015 fbo stick.
60mph - 130mph = 7.99 seconds as of yesterday

Edelbrock 2.65 TVS on 93 octane w/3" pulley only 11* of spark and 100* ambient temps so not the best of times, but only one I have access too right now.

It was 7.67 back when I had the stock TB and intake in cooler weather with 15* of spark(dyno'd 638whp). So this new set up should be quicker, just haven't logged any pulls in decent weather yet.
Any idea why the low timing? 100* is hot but I'm just curious/asking as it's lower than I see at similar temps. Positive knock?
Sponsored

 
 




Top