Sponsored

2015-17 Mustang GT Ford Performance Power Packs

JustinReed

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 11, 2015
Threads
34
Messages
292
Reaction score
37
Location
Santee
Vehicle(s)
2017 Mustang GT
I know but those are peak numbers at around 6500 rpm. There are graphs some where on the sight that shows they are almost equal at 1500 rpm or on the low end
Lmao, and how much time is any given driver at 1500rpms???
Sponsored

 

texasboy21

Well-Known Member
Joined
Dec 27, 2016
Threads
14
Messages
482
Reaction score
159
Location
Houston
Vehicle(s)
2017 GT PP. 2005.5 Audi A4, 1983 Silverado
Lmao, and how much time is any given driver at 1500rpms???
Likely the same if not more than the amount of time one spends at 7000.

In normal driving conditions, you have to rev 1500rpms. To hit 7000rpms, you also have to rev to 1500rpms.
 

JustinReed

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 11, 2015
Threads
34
Messages
292
Reaction score
37
Location
Santee
Vehicle(s)
2017 Mustang GT
Likely the same if not more than the amount of time one spends at 7000.

In normal driving conditions, you have to rev 1500rpms. To hit 7000rpms, you also have to rev to 1500rpms.
That may be true, but the other numbers in the links I posted are also true.
 

re-rx7

Ruck the night away
Joined
May 24, 2015
Threads
17
Messages
783
Reaction score
366
Location
Gainesville, Tx
First Name
Brandon
Vehicle(s)
19 5.0
Faster off the line
Also more wheel spin.....
Because I accelerate normally from a stop 50 times a day, I hit 7000 RPM once a month.
Im talking about for racing im not concerned with 1500 rpms. I want the PP2 becuase of the fat curve right in the middle of the graph. The curve on the 2 is actually better than the 3 till about 6900 rpm.
 

ForYourOwnGood

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jun 28, 2016
Threads
41
Messages
1,396
Reaction score
627
Location
Central MA
Vehicle(s)
2017 Grabber Blue 5.0
Also more wheel spin.....

Im talking about for racing im not concerned with 1500 rpms. I want the PP2 becuase of the fat curve right in the middle of the graph. The curve on the 2 is actually better than the 3 till about 6900 rpm.
I understand but thats not what your post had said so I responded accordingly. You definitely want that meaty midrange for any sort of road race or auto-x.
 

Sponsored

Sc00ter

Sc00ter
Joined
Jul 14, 2014
Threads
5
Messages
523
Reaction score
86
Location
Emmaus, Pennsylvania
First Name
Scott
Vehicle(s)
Triple Yellow GT Premium w/50th Appearance
I'll never understand why more tq at 1500 rpm matters.
I spend a lot of time at 1,500 rpm here in PA. That's about 60 mph in 6th gear in my non-PP 5.0 GT 6-speed manual, and we still have 55 mph limits on many roads.
Although our cars don't lug at low rpm like the PPs, a little more low-end grunt for steady-state cruising is always good.
:thumbsup:
 

texasboy21

Well-Known Member
Joined
Dec 27, 2016
Threads
14
Messages
482
Reaction score
159
Location
Houston
Vehicle(s)
2017 GT PP. 2005.5 Audi A4, 1983 Silverado
I spend a lot of time at 1,500 rpm here in PA. That's about 60 mph in 6th gear in my non-PP 5.0 GT 6-speed manual, and we still have 55 mph limits on many roads.
Although our cars don't lug at low rpm like the PPs, a little more low-end grunt for steady-state cruising is always good.
:thumbsup:
Why does a PP car lug at low rpms? They are gears shorter.
 

Sc00ter

Sc00ter
Joined
Jul 14, 2014
Threads
5
Messages
523
Reaction score
86
Location
Emmaus, Pennsylvania
First Name
Scott
Vehicle(s)
Triple Yellow GT Premium w/50th Appearance
Beats me, but more than one PP owner here has complained about it.
My car doesn't like accelerating from 1,200 rpm in track mode, so maybe it has something to do with higher expectations
:ford:
 

THE_AHJ

AuthorityHvngJurisdiction
Joined
Mar 3, 2017
Threads
37
Messages
449
Reaction score
94
Location
562 ~ 714
First Name
Alberto
Vehicle(s)
Metrolink
Switching to RTR Grille soon, leaving side vents open completely for better airflow. I’m already running K&N Drycharger® Anyone running this setup and have any issues with rain getting in? Does the filter stay dry? Thoughts and comments welcome.
 

Eritas

Well-Known Member
Joined
Aug 30, 2017
Threads
0
Messages
935
Reaction score
404
Location
Florida
Vehicle(s)
2016 Mustang GT
I spend a lot of time at 1,500 rpm here in PA. That's about 60 mph in 6th gear in my non-PP 5.0 GT 6-speed manual, and we still have 55 mph limits on many roads.
Although our cars don't lug at low rpm like the PPs, a little more low-end grunt for steady-state cruising is always good.
:thumbsup:
To hell with downshifting! :headbang:
 

Sponsored

Bridgie

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 25, 2015
Threads
45
Messages
587
Reaction score
962
Location
Raleigh, North Carolina
First Name
Dave
Vehicle(s)
2015 GT fastback. PP, 50th trim, Black
Just had th PP2 installed.. what a difference, smooth and pulls hard.. why the tune wasn’t on the car from the factory I don’t know.

May be a stupid question... so I will apologize in advance.

Does the Pro Cal tool need to stay in the OBD Port.. being Illuminates BLUE all the time whilst driving.? Or has my tech forgot to remove it.?
 

Eritas

Well-Known Member
Joined
Aug 30, 2017
Threads
0
Messages
935
Reaction score
404
Location
Florida
Vehicle(s)
2016 Mustang GT
Just had th PP2 installed.. what a difference, smooth and pulls hard.. why the tune wasn’t on the car from the factory I don’t know.

May be a stupid question... so I will apologize in advance.

Does the Pro Cal tool need to stay in the OBD Port.. being Illuminates BLUE all the time whilst driving.? Or has my tech forgot to remove it.?
Lol. Yes remove it. I think the tune is for 91oct+ while the standard mustang can run on 87?

Have you dynoed it?
 

Bridgie

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 25, 2015
Threads
45
Messages
587
Reaction score
962
Location
Raleigh, North Carolina
First Name
Dave
Vehicle(s)
2015 GT fastback. PP, 50th trim, Black
Lol. Yes remove it. I think the tune is for 91oct+ while the standard mustang can run on 87?

Have you dynoed it?
Thanks, I was certain it should be...

Not Dyno’d, not really interested in numbers, the driveability and feeling are much more important than ‘Cock waving’ in the Gym showers..

A 120 mile jaunt this evening confirmed that, no track time planned 7ntil next year though :(
 
 








Top