Hack
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Nov 26, 2014
- Threads
- 84
- Messages
- 12,330
- Reaction score
- 7,498
- Location
- Minneapolis
- Vehicle(s)
- Mustang, Camaro
Not that interested with the 6 cylinder. I'd be more interested in an older one.
Sponsored
Agreed the Eco is the one thing turning me off a little. Something about a truck makes we want a V8 just like a Mustang.Not that interested with the 6 cylinder. I'd be more interested in an older one.
I don't really care about fuel economy. I think a supercharged V8 can do ok for torque. Less weight could be good if the engine was fun to listen to.That beefy torque curve, better fuel economy, and 700lbs less weight? Sign me up for a new one. If I could some how justify it I would bet getting one, but no real need for a giant truck
5.2 would be terrible in the Raptor. That engine doesn't have enough low end torque to tow anything.That is a great pic of a raptor, like the best one I've ever seen. I expected more HP then what they announced for the 17. Its was like 408 HP and 420TQ. Was expecting closer to 500. They should have put the 5.2 in it. Heck the 5.0 would have been just as good.
Silver Lake is a Raptors playground. Been there a bunch of times and have gotten air countless times. :cheers:Ummmm that's my back yard!! I know that place anywhere. I have a house at silver lake sand dunes! Been their since I was 3 (45 now)
The power numbers for the 2017 Raptor hasn't been released yet. It should be atleast 450HP. Unless im reading what you said completely wrongThat is a great pic of a raptor, like the best one I've ever seen. I expected more HP then what they announced for the 17. Its was like 408 HP and 420TQ. Was expecting closer to 500. They should have put the 5.2 in it. Heck the 5.0 would have been just as good.