Exactly, it would have been nice if the 301A had included the digital cluster. Would have made sense IMO.Voted analog but only because of cost and the need for leather seats. If 301A included digital that would be fine.
Isn't that mostly a consequence of the steering wheel dimensions - wheel inside diameter, spoke size/location, and airbag-containing horn button bulk? There used to be more room, and I think that less was sacrificed in spreading the major instruments apart and maintaining their size than making them smaller so they could be made to fit in close. Moving the minor gauges outboard would most likely end up hiding them almost completely behind today's (thicker) steering wheels.
Normally I'm a big fan of physical analog guages. But the sweet spot of the tach should be as close to front and center as possible. The Mustang gauge layout with the speedo and the tach splayed out to make room for an ancillary display in the middle has always bothered me.
Honestly, an integrated shift light is the only thing missing from the current gen dash. While I wouldn't complain about having the new digital dash, I certainly wouldn't pay an exorbitant amount more for it. If someone could figure out how to turn the gauges red at a set-able RPM (both day and night), that would be fantastic.Isn't that mostly a consequence of the steering wheel dimensions - wheel inside diameter, spoke size/location, and airbag-containing horn button bulk? There used to be more room, and I think that less was sacrificed in spreading the major instruments apart and maintaining their size than making them smaller so they could be made to fit in close. Moving the minor gauges outboard would most likely end up hiding them almost completely behind today's (thicker) steering wheels.
The tach display in the above picture is spread out to well over half the total IP width. You don't need the kind of resolution that provides, nor can you even use it when the rpms are rising rapidly. The only thing it's got going for it is that the middle rpm range is not all squished together like the 50 - 70 mph range used to be on some mechanical speedometer designs of the 1960's.
Norm
At least to me, it isn't the resolution of the tach, but that it puts the higher RPM's (shift points) dead center in front of you.The tach display in the above picture is spread out to well over half the total IP width. You don't need the kind of resolution that provides, nor can you even use it when the rpms are rising rapidly. The only thing it's got going for it is that the middle rpm range is not all squished together like the 50 - 70 mph range used to be on some mechanical speedometer designs of the 1960's.
so the old people can see....kinda like the "large" print editions of books...Speaking of gauge cluster designed - I was dropped off at my office by my service shop in a 05 Buick last week. I couldn't believe the size of the fuel gauge...at least the new cluster layout doesn't resemble this
Exactly. With the critical point of the tach dead center it's very easy to see at a glance even when you're rapidly climbing toward redline.At least to me, it isn't the resolution of the tach, but that it puts the higher RPM's (shift points) dead center in front of you.