I didn't do the test, nor trying to recover, passing along our dealers info. In fact, it was another poster that actually added the detail.Thats not what was 1st stated thus why i raised the question.
Wouldnt want anyone getting away with inflated dyno numbers around here or trying to compare apples to oranges :lol:........
Geee makes a hell of alot more sense if BOTH are the same and one only has the gen2 vs the gen3 everything else being equal.
Ill give you an A- on the attempted recovery here.
Now adding a 20% OD combined with the smaller 3.25 is should be a no brainer that the input speed is different than a 20% OD combined with the 3.75 setup.
Its pretty straight forward here but people need to get their shit together and get the story right LOL.
Ohh and if the Gen3 is more effecient then how do both "supposedly" make 17 psi of boost when one setup is 20% OD plus 3.25 and one is 20% OD plus 3.75?
Given one has a more effecient blower and one is spinning the blower harder then how can the boost psi be the same IF indeed everything else is the same?
Both engines should flow the same thus the boost HAS to be different or was the 17psi claim on both incorrect also? :shrug:
Again apparently people need to get the story right of what happened here.
You cant spin one harder and have the psi the same. Obviously given the pulley info the input speed is different.
Id totally believe and understand that it made 60 more hp going from gen2 to gen3 but then how do both make 17psi supposedly when the pulley setups are different......
:headbonk:
The Gen 2 had the 20%/3.25". The Gen 3 had the 20%/3.75". The Gen 3 had 17psi, I don't have the data on the Gen 2 boost. What the info provided is that even with .50" larger SC pulley, which normally results in LOWER power, it actually made 60RWHP MORE horsepower. Showing again, what everyone has witnessed, far more power with the Gen 3 than the Gen 2, even with a lower supercharger overdrive.
Sponsored